Discovery Gaming Community
Staff Feedback Thread - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Community Feedback (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=627)
+--- Thread: Staff Feedback Thread (/showthread.php?tid=168272)



RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Darius - 08-10-2022

Nyx is correct in that regard.


RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Leo - 08-10-2022

(08-10-2022, 02:19 AM)Kauket Wrote:
(08-10-2022, 02:13 AM)Leo Wrote: In a similar vein (where outdated posts are concerned), this post is very outdated. Anyway we can get it updated?

~Leo

Is that even used? I thought it was the pinned one in the unofficial section.

https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=132824

That appears to be for the Unofficial factions not the Official factions. Is there another post I'm unaware of?

~Leo


RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Kauket - 08-10-2022

For official factions, this is the up to date list - as linked earlier during the GMG query.

https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=159096


RE: Admin Feedback Thread - St.Denis - 08-10-2022

(08-09-2022, 06:09 PM)DariusCiprian Wrote: Hello!

What has happened to the GMG| listing in this section? It still appears in the Inter-House section, which is a bit weird. No announcement of possible disbandment has been made, either.

Resolved.

Probably one of those things that was just overlooked.



RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Sombs - 02-15-2023

Right, thanks for deleting the post that belongs in this thread instead:

[Image: SKM4eKj.png]

But hey, removing the thread including Darius's out of place ad hominem (it would have sufficed to keep that on Discord) is probably a good thing.


RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Hawk Jones - 02-15-2023

I know I have been reported by Darius (HMS-Pembroke) and maybe others, and got this conversation beforehand:
I went into the line of fire at the base but didn't attack back, only later defended allies, in group that were clearly shot against. IMG have ID lines and they have in-RP reasons to be angry when Bretonia and Crayter meddle in things in independent worlds because of the canonical past around Aland.

That's all good and fine - niche knowledge. If you feel the ID is overpowered, okay - but that has to be solved by changing the ID, not these arbitrary interventions mid-heated siege. And if you make a mistake it would be great if you made announcements saying such right away so players aren't confused, or call senior staff if you aren't sure.


RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Darius - 02-15-2023

[Image: Capture_decran_73.png]

[Image: Capture_decran_75.png]


RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Sombs - 02-15-2023

Make a restart IMG ship and look at how allied they are in the repsheet - the thing that decides whether people are green, white or red to each other.

The line also says Can attack --->ANY<--- ship to protect allies.


RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Karst - 02-15-2023

Don't take infocard alliances too seriously. A lot of them probably haven't been updated since vanilla.

IMG has strong reasons to oppose Bretonia and CR, for pretty obvious reasons if you've been around for their recent history. If people want to play IMG characters that hate CR despite CR's constant attempts at gaslighting them about their betrayal, that's fine.


RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Darius - 02-15-2023

Karst, that's your opinion and by now everyone knows it's biased to hell and back. Please don't actually continue amusing us with your wild takes.

IMG are by definition a CR ally. There is no standing reason to assist random scientists over your largest and most important ally. The same goes for the ALG. Shooting CR/BIS makes 0 sense from a roleplay perspective.

Besides, shooting allies without a good amount of roleplay to back it up has always been against the rules.