+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Regarding Freeport 11 (/showthread.php?tid=118772)
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Omicron - 08-05-2014
Nowadays they want to get monopoly on every single Freeport in the game that's not TAZ, Gytrash is just extension of it.
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Sabru - 08-05-2014
(08-05-2014, 02:02 AM)Omicron Wrote: Nowadays they want to get monopoly on every single Freeport in the game that's not TAZ, Gytrash is just extension of it.
last i checked, my independent freeport 9 (not related in any way to TAZ) isnt part of some OSI monopoly, neither is the CW's FP10 or Freeport 6, or 2 or most of the other zoner stations and bases. So your point is very flawed.
and dont say "CoF is OSI puppet" because you know thats a load of bull.
Im actually still waiting for an explanation of how your order admiral knew to turn up in baffin at the exact time of the welcoming event for the summit..... when the usmmit was inRP only known to zoners.
unless some zoner is actually spying for the Order.
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Omicron - 08-05-2014
Would FP9 decide to leave CoF, would it had been allowed? Case of Fp11, CoF apparently is club with entrance but no exit, in hope to be used in completely OORP hatred move against me as a player with zero roleplay justification. Still, you connect irrevelant to each other characters of mine. Your failure to consider a pure coincidence is astonishing.
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Sabru - 08-05-2014
(08-05-2014, 02:20 AM)Omicron Wrote: Your failure to consider a pure coincidence is astonishing.pure co-incidence, my hiney.
with you golly, there are no co-incidences. it would take an absurd amount of things lining up for you crashing the party to be a coincidence.
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Omicron - 08-05-2014
As it was said in CoF chat, you are free to continue perceiving the world through your limited palette of colours with complete disregard to everyone else. Spontaenous role-play happens all the time and created the biggest events of Discovery. Do I have to remind that it was indie-related drama that made SCRA as we know it today possible and it was Outcast drama that made RoS possible. Those are but two examples out of many.
You continue to miss crucial point that it has all been spontaneous with no pre-planning involved or any intentions on behalf of Order| patrol that stumbled upon your super-secret Persephone.
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - n00bl3t - 08-05-2014
(08-05-2014, 02:16 AM)Sabre Wrote: last i checked, my independent freeport 9 (not related in any way to TAZ)
Just a point to consider:
It isn't related to TAZ unless someone powergames/roleplays that it is a secret TAZ or OSI spy. (Much like how my current character is being used in that way.)
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Thyrzul - 08-05-2014
(08-05-2014, 02:20 AM)Omicron Wrote: Your failure to consider a pure coincidence is astonishing.
It is funny that the coincidental apearance of your admiral ended up in hostility based on something bordering powergaming, seeing nowhere it is specified that the inverted graviton shield of the Persephone is indeed supposed to look like a nomad city shield, thus leaving the possibility of it simply being the result of gameplay limitations open. (E.g. similar gameplay limitations restricted the IRG to use the Leviathan model for the Ingenuus, should any other model in-game have a similar sphere in it's middle they would have more options to choose from, as I've been told.) I'm curious how many of you checked ooRPly what that shield bubble around the Persephone actually is before writing up all the inRP accusations, and conclusions based on mere visuals.
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Havok - 08-05-2014
(08-05-2014, 07:45 AM)Thyrzul Wrote:(E.g. similar gameplay limitations restricted the IRG to use the Leviathan model for the Ingenuus, should any other model in-game have a similar sphere in it's middle they would have more options to choose from, as I've been told.)
This is entirely correct. The Leviathan is the only ship that offered us what we needed with the sphere in the middle. If any other model were available with such or a similar attribute, it would've surely been considered, but since its not IRG settled with the Leviathan.
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Moberg - 08-05-2014
(08-05-2014, 07:45 AM)Thyrzul Wrote:seeing nowhere it is specified that the inverted graviton shield of the Persephone is indeed supposed to look like a nomad city shield, thus leaving the possibility of it simply being the result of gameplay limitations open.
To be fair, you have to consider that people don't read every single story post ever written on the forums. The sphere looks like a nomad shield fx, and that's exactly what the characters saw in it. What it really is does not matter. The Order interpreted the effect they saw and until it is proven that it is not of nomad origin by an investigation or whatever they will probably not change their minds.
Opting out of a situation by providing ooRP knowledge won't help to progress the roleplay. Choices were made and now the consequences have to be faced. How is any character supposed to know for sure that it is of nomad origin other than getting it proven inRP?
Even if it is out of lack of effects to work with, one should really assume before mounting it that a nomad shield fx might be interpreted as nomad shield fx, no matter what you say what it actually is.
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Arioch - 08-05-2014
One hand yes, you're right. On the other though, multiple attempts to provide what it is inRP was given, and the Order are refusing to accept it.
It's a giant mess, that really shouldn't have started in the first place, but... meh.
On the flip side, we in the IRG know exactly what is on the ship, and have even more reason to sneak away from the Order.
![[Image: bandit.gif]](http://www.sherv.net/cm/page/hidden/skype/bandit.gif)