Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Thread: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks (/showthread.php?tid=137512) |
RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - Sol - 03-29-2016 (03-29-2016, 12:13 PM)Laz Wrote: VERY SIMPLE VERSION: Wow, what a bright person. Bright enough to not understand that I am telling the very same thing since my first post, and needs to explain the same thing over and over again. Time to join the rest of the retardation team and join in with the senseless giggling, right? Because why care about what others think of you? Why care about where you have been lacking and why care about why you have been complaining so much about all this unfair treatment towards the nomads? It surely is not a problem associated with the nature of nomad RP at all after all... It's the others. They are stupid, and their opinions and observations are also stupid and not worth more than a laugh out loud. Keep up doing that, it will surely work for you. RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - SnakThree - 03-29-2016 If people don't want to log to "interact" with cloaked Nomad, there's noone to fear them in the first place. So how about Nomad players man up, and play by the same standards as everyone else? You had the pleasure of being able to attack people with no roleplay whatosever. That was preferential treatment. You have infinite cloaks that you can use to hide infinitely and ambush anyone. That is preferential treatment. And argument that your cloak takes longer to charge is nothing to balance out the benefit of having ability yo choose how to start interaction if at all with no counters but very very rare case of Cloak Disruptor. RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - The Savage - 03-29-2016 Um, remind me since when K'hara can attack without roleplay? I thought the recent ID update clearly states that all Nomads are not exempted from roleplay before engagement. But, to point the other side's arguments - think that nomspeech needs some time to be written. It gives, alongside with de-cloaking, actually a very huge timegap - up to the minute. Minute is enough for other players to both notice Nomad/K'hara and prepare for the worst. RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - Foxglove - 03-29-2016 If it's the Nomspeak you're worried about: let me put your mind at ease, @Sol, because there are already people working on it to make it easier/more understandable. @HuggieSunrise recently started a thread discussing Nomad roleplay and I recommend you take a look at it. I personally don't care about the infinite cloak, Nemo. If it were gone, though, the Nomad cloak should get the same charge time as the human ones and the line about us needing to be uncloaked to RP must be removed for your level playing field to be a reality. This, of course, means that we can still buttcloak you, so what's your point? Everyone can do it and if you want Nomads to be held to the same standard, you know nothing is going to change. RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - Laz - 03-29-2016 (03-29-2016, 12:18 PM)Snak3 Wrote: You have infinite cloaks that you can use to hide infinitely and ambush anyone.Try writing some Nomad RP. Nom speak takes so long to write and with the new rule of stopping cloak engagement notices, the time you have decloaked and put down you engagement notice. Any advantage of the cloak is lost. Thats assuming you just want to log to kill people. RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - SnakThree - 03-29-2016 (03-29-2016, 12:21 PM)Toris Wrote: Um, remind me since when K'hara can attack without roleplay? I thought the recent ID update clearly states that all Nomads are not exempted from roleplay before engagement. Once you learn to read with proper attention, you will notice I was talking about the past preferential treatment. RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - Marillion - 03-29-2016 (03-29-2016, 11:57 AM)Foxglove Wrote: A) Nomspeak is incredibly time consuming to write compared to normal English Yes,it is a hard way to learn the speech. Me as a German Guy. For me it is much Harder learn the speech, Spended much time till now untill i get fine(I have 2 DinA4 sides with Adverbs and synonoms learned). The Peoples that learned English as Motherspeech its hard enough but i think lower different as myself. And learn the Speech "Benear Perfect" is a Main before u can join the K'hara. And then if u accepted and get the use of INfinite Cloak (U need the 4 million Energy Commodity) it is a low price when u calculate how much time u spended to learn speech, make nice RP with peoples so they enjoy it before join K'Hara. GReetings Abiyamuta RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - Epo - 03-29-2016 I'm against adding bases, but definitely for adding one-sided jumpholes leading directly from iota to various systems (like the 4 K'Hara only already existant Jump Gates in iota) RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - DragonRider - 03-29-2016 complainting about getting buttcloaked in the omicrons is like entering a warzone and complaining you got sniped. RE: Removing K'hara infinity cloaks - SnakThree - 03-29-2016 (03-29-2016, 01:17 PM)DragonRider Wrote: complainting about getting buttcloaked in the omicrons is like entering a warzone and complaining you got sniped. Complaining about being piled up as aliens is like being an alien that is hated. Oh wait. |