DELETE - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: DELETE (/showthread.php?tid=56033) |
Dublin. To BAF, BPA, Mollys, IMG, BMM and Gaians - Mímir - 03-05-2011 ' Wrote:The same principles apply. Although wartime economics are radically different in the sense that state nationalisation can be used as a temporary tool to cut costs (deducting the usual profits from the overall cost of production), and wages can be frozen in / workers can operate on a voluntary basis for the country, only getting paid in food rations etc. further cutting costs whilst maintaining high productivity (propaganda, the love of the nation and the well-being of your home as a driving factor as opposed to wages). We saw both mechanisms during the second world war, mind you. ' Wrote:RP wise Bretonia is not "losing", they are at a stalemate with Kusari in Leeds. Fair enough, it was my impression that they were getting a royal arsekicking. In that light the above doesn't apply, as Bret are not that pressed. ' Wrote:You're confusing player output with RP - by that logic the BAF would consist of less than 50 people. No, I am assuming that player actions reflect the general situation of Sirius. ' Wrote:I doubt one battleship would be able to turn the tide since in-RP the BAF warship arsenal comprises of several hundred vessels. See above. Yes, its only one boat, but for me the stationed battleships around sirius reflect strongholds - the immobile battleships representing a battleforce/battlegroup or something far more powerful that the NPC battleships spawning here and there. For me as a player, the main objective here is to make sure we dont lose mining, whilst on the other hand try and reduce the number of undesirable player actions, and I think to achieve that we have to be somewhat pragmatic. But lets see what happens. Perhaps a simple reduction or Ore prices would be the solution (although that would definitely also be a blow to BMM / Bret. economy). Dublin. To BAF, BPA, Mollys, IMG, BMM and Gaians - Hastings - 03-05-2011 ' Wrote:Although wartime economics are radically different in the sense that state nationalisation can be used as a temporary tool to cut costs (deducting the usual profits from the overall cost of production), and wages can be frozen in / workers can operate on a voluntary basis for the country, only getting paid in food rations etc. further cutting costs whilst maintaining high productivity (propaganda, the love of the nation and the well-being of your home as a driving factor as opposed to wages). We saw both mechanisms during the second world war, mind you. Nationalization is already a facet of the Bretonian economy. Mining's back, your point is moot. Dublin. To BAF, BPA, Mollys, IMG, BMM and Gaians - Mímir - 03-05-2011 ' Wrote:Nationalization is already a facet of the Bretonian economy. But as you know, there are varying degrees of nationalisation. But as long as mining is on, and people act somewhat sensible, I am happy |