+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII (/showthread.php?tid=5810)
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - Jwnantze - 01-28-2008
nice job, that sucker looks mean! ill swap my waren in for one....
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - ScornStar - 01-28-2008
I read the current ones info card, and thanks to you I got to refresh on the info. If its just retextureing then I shut my self down. One other thing civilians pay for escort from Merc, Freelancers, and off duty others, thats what they are there for right. I just think no one should have it all. Anyway different thread for that, thanks for answering my concerns. And I WANT to see that Order bomber *wiping froth from mouth, and composeing myself*:nyam:
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - Dusty Lens - 01-28-2008
If I could be so bold as to jump in with my own bit of opinion...
The bomber was looking awesome back on pages one and two. You set out to build yourself a sleek, small and maneuverable bomber with slightly reduced power and hull than the previous civilian model. Looked like you had that one padlocked.
I think the fattened hull is detracting from that somewhat... And additionally I can't help but feel that the rabbit ears currently gracing the aft are somewhat off balancing the lower stern V fins... The complimentary pair really gave a stronger sense of aerodynamics in addition.
I love my preggers chicken, just don't want to replace her with a preggers rabbit:)
I know I'm being a might presumptuous with these suggestions, and that this soup has a lot of cooks at the moment, but it seemed like I might as well pitch in my two cents.
-DL
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - pipsqueak - 01-28-2008
ok.... one last try......
Love it but before we finalize....lets try opening the tail up once again.....
this time go big.... 40~45 degrees.... keep every thing else the same.
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - mjolnir - 01-28-2008
Same for me.. the one on the first page was by far the best....sometimes less is more
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - Zavier - 01-28-2008
I agree with Dusty. The first couple of models were best. I'd like the second model with the taiidan wings of the third..
Don't forget people. The Taiidan bomber is smaller than the Eagle. They're the same length, eagle is taller and wider.
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - McNeo - 01-28-2008
Its like the story with the Golf GTi. Started as a great small car, and gained weight over the decades...
I say make it sleeker like it was on page 1, but enlarge the main wings slightly to make it larger (length as well as width and depth).
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - Unseelie - 01-28-2008
Yup....Adding my voice to that of these other...characters.
The early versions were the best!
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - I_m_rdy - 01-28-2008
Lemme raise my voice! I have backups!
I committed a sin. I scaled that model a bit. And I do mean a bit. But yeah, I'll go for McNeo's suggestion...
Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII - Virus - 01-28-2008
I like the first one best. Personal choice. The others look like they have simply too much... Useless stuff.
Simple is better.