+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: mid sized armored and armed transport (/showthread.php?tid=87476)
RE: mid sized armored and armed transport - Ursus - 11-16-2012
container pods are awesome. all ships should use container pods. and we should have more container pods to choose from for RP purposes. why does the Uruz have gas pods? why dont we have gas pods to put on other ships?
we should have freighters with pods too, for off-loading cargo from transports and inter-base traffic. http://discoverygc.com/wiki/CTE_FR-2302-K_Civilian_Freighter should use a pod
RE: mid sized armored and armed transport - Croft - 11-16-2012
The Firefly needs to be removed solely on the fact that it is not an original design, it's an import that much is set in stone. At the end of the day it's pointless asking for new transports as people just aren't interested in doing them.
RE: mid sized armored and armed transport - Govedo13 - 11-16-2012
(11-16-2012, 05:30 PM)Jinx Wrote: have no use / support for them regarding to their lore.Well civilian ship with tons of support and tons of lore reasons to replace the firefly got rejected because you have no interest in finishing it because it is some random civilian non zoner thing I see.
We stack lies and excuses here. It would be just better for all- devs and players when you post your concepts in the media center and does not flood the ship submissions with ships that you have no intention to submit.
RE: mid sized armored and armed transport - AeternusDoleo - 11-23-2012
So, let another dev see if they can build a more heavily armed transport based on the Gull. Jinx withdrew this one, so this discussion is done.