![]() |
Playerbase Siege Adjustments - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: News and Announcements (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Thread: Playerbase Siege Adjustments (/showthread.php?tid=200646) |
RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - Lord Chaos - 12-15-2023 Quote:Posted by Jayenbee - Today, 02:03 AM The post in question is dated after the declaration of the attack and the attempted purchase. The IMG is free to make any claims they desire, but it's a falsehood; there was no Junker mining scrap belonging to Beaumont after my acquisition. Despite requesting evidence, none was provided. The assertion that they don't have an obligation to present evidence implies a dangerous precedent. "I saw Liberty Navy mining with Nomads and Zoners in Dublin." Essentially, anyone could make baseless claims and take any action without being held accountable, as exemplified by the siege attacking fleet composition. I will not address the issue of your intelligence, as you would need a brain to discuss such matters in the first place. (12-15-2023, 07:15 AM)SnakThree Wrote:(12-14-2023, 11:42 PM)Lord Chaos Wrote: In the new system, bases that are nearly a decade old and served the comunity for years, like Beaumont Spire, can be easily dismantled with minimal effort. Just to clarify, I didn't relocate the base, nor did I alter its IFF. I acquired it after it had been moved, motivated solely by the respect for Beaumont's longstanding presence on the server. My intention was to reactivate it in its new location. If the objective wasn't to destroy the base, why didn't IMG allow us to move it again? There's a lot of rhetoric about being the "natural" faction, but the actions speak louder. The server witnessed your group's conduct, and now you're attempting to tarnish my reputation with unfounded allegations about decisions I supposedly made. The reality is, I didn't make any decisions; I simply tried to prevent a valuable asset from changing hands indiscriminately. I'm indifferent to the base itself; its worth lies in the memories of those who played around it for years. Unlike many, I respect that history and chose to acquire it. However, it seems that some took issue with my post, perhaps out of envy, and resorted to the usual tactics – griefing. In the end, Beaumont served its purpose well: it exposed the true nature of the griefers, showcased the reality of how things are done on the Discovery "RP" server, and highlighted how rules can be bent in certain directions when convenient. Despite constant attempts to tarnish my image with lies, Beaumont turned out to be the perfect bait, and all the detractors eagerly took it. RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - SnakThree - 12-15-2023 (12-15-2023, 07:22 PM)Lord Chaos Wrote: Just to clarify, I didn't relocate the base, nor did I alter its IFF. I acquired it after it had been moved, motivated solely by the respect for Beaumont's longstanding presence on the server. My intention was to reactivate it in its new location. If the objective wasn't to destroy the base, why didn't IMG allow us to move it again? I am fairly certain nobody cares about you as much as you think they do. If POB is in contested space, that solid RP reason to siege it. Roleplay is simple on Disco. You seem to be paranoid that someone is out to get you. RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - Couden - 12-15-2023 (12-15-2023, 07:22 PM)Lord Chaos Wrote: There's a lot of rhetoric about being the "natural" faction, but the actions speak louder. The server witnessed your group's conduct, and now you're attempting to tarnish my reputation with unfounded allegations about decisions I supposedly made. The reality is, I didn't make any decisions; I simply tried to prevent a valuable asset from changing hands indiscriminately.Please dont cry for another 4 months to get your pob restored. Old Traffold is a reason why is it hopeless to watch bopers yells all around sirius and are sellimg base because they cannot handle with it. (noI am not trolling/flamming) RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - Lord Chaos - 12-15-2023 (12-15-2023, 08:10 PM)SnakThree Wrote:NOW Im starting to feel important ...*blushes*(12-15-2023, 07:22 PM)Lord Chaos Wrote: Just to clarify, I didn't relocate the base, nor did I alter its IFF. I acquired it after it had been moved, motivated solely by the respect for Beaumont's longstanding presence on the server. My intention was to reactivate it in its new location. If the objective wasn't to destroy the base, why didn't IMG allow us to move it again? Yet another futile attempt to tarnish my image, this time by gaslighting... ridiculous. I said lies were said about me with the intent of staining my image somehow, and these are here on this very thread. Keep proving me right. *smiles "wonders why that other also Junker PoB in the same location didnt get an A.D." ![]() Flatered as i may be, it wwould be nice to return to the point of PoB Mechanics like i asked before and the thread is about. RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - Prysin - 12-15-2023 Siege mechanic works pretty OK. Get some friends and defend the base if you want to keep it. Otherwise let it die. It's pixels. The "stories built around the base" are merely stories, written on the forums. They could have been written with or without the base ingame. Don't refuse to use voice chat or discord to coordinate, because the attackers certainly are. Why put yourself at a disadvantage? Do you want to lose? Can't speak english well? Guess its time to practice while defending. Live in a noisy enviroment or with family? Use Push-to-talk. cannot speak english at all? Learn to listen, listening does wonders. Unless you're deaf and mute, there's no good reason not to use voice chat to coordinate in a fight. Get someone (or do it yourself) to call targets. Focus attackers one by one. Stay in formation. Do not spread out. Those who spread out will be targeted. And if you still don't want to get a gang, use VC, call targets etc... you deserve to lose the base, the fight and whatever else was involved. RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - Lord Chaos - 12-16-2023 Keep proving me right. *smiles RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - Saronsen - 12-16-2023 you moved beaumont spire from texas to the omegas somehow, you probably deserved it RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - Stewgar - 12-16-2023 (12-15-2023, 11:25 PM)Prysin Wrote: It's pixels. The "stories built around the base" are merely stories, written on the forums. They could have been written with or without the base ingame Here is the problem with that logic. In some cases, even I would say that a POB deserves to die because of poor RP or location. However, there has been some notable instances over the past... year + where it seems the same groups and same people are sieging POBs often with little to no RP (or in a recent case, jenky and forced RP). So while yes, they are just pixels with stories (most of my RP has been in game or in Discord to prevent meta), people put real time and energy into building them. Not everybody has the amount of free time that some believe everybody has to continue building, maintaining, and then having to rebuild POBs because some kids like to kick down sand castles. Yes, there are cases where even I say "suck it up buttercup". Painting with a broad brush and saying they are merely stories and just pixels is disingenuous to those that put a lot of time into these "pixels". I give kudos to the dev team for the changes that have already happened surrounding sieges, such as siege windows, and their continued attention into POBs. RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - D.I.E. Pablo Escobar - 12-16-2023 ...lets see in 4 weeks wen the next attack declaration comes... RE: Playerbase Siege Adjustments - Lord Chaos - 12-16-2023 (12-16-2023, 06:02 AM)Saronsen Wrote: you moved beaumont spire from texas to the omegas somehow, you probably deserved it Il use capitals this time maybe ppl have eye problems. I DID NOT MOVE THE BASE SOMEONE ELSE DID!!! Stewgar Wrote:I give kudos to the dev team for the changes that have already happened surrounding sieges, such as siege windows, and their continued attention into POBs.I sign under these words tho |