+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Stories and Biographies (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=56)
+--- Thread: Escorts / merc's message dump (/showthread.php?tid=1029)
Escorts / merc's message dump - Fellow Hoodlum - 08-16-2006
Message to: All here
Comm ID: Hoodlum
Gentlemen, while a hijack has been in progress under your noses for quite some time here,
though no complaints have been received to now, we have slipped a little OOC in the
last few posts, starting with the AW. Lovely thread, and Night and me have bumped
it alot so you guys can use it for its intended ... Aint hard to make it IC to get your point
over. Thanks for your time.
Incharacterage ends:
Escorts / merc's message dump - Nightfall - 08-16-2006
Message TO:
Comm ID: Nightfall
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax
materiam possit materiari?
Sic faciunt omnes.
The worst thing, my friend is that some people that were pretty much
screaming about OOCs in other places and times are doing it in this time
and place.. but no matter. I'm sure the mistake will be corrected. It could
have also been said the same IC. I don't know how will they be reacting to
a Comitatus and his client... no prob if the Comitatus is alone though.
On the other hand... Is this a snatch? Don't think so. Just an exchange of
thoughts in system channel!
Bernard.
Escorts / merc's message dump - Fellow Hoodlum - 08-16-2006
Bernard old man, your thoughts and words are as always on the ball. Seem to be slipping
back to Cornelius again ... And if you will excuse my rusty language skills here, school
was a little while ago.
"Taurus excreta cerebrum vincit"
Hope I got that right there. Books were never me strong point. Field trips with the latin
class were a hoot though ... Seem to remember a fine filly or two. Ah well ...
A shot across the bows from both parties will always be better than one.
Back to the usual then old boy ? Or just the mundane ?
Hoodlum
:dry:
Escorts / merc's message dump - Alex06 - 08-16-2006
From : FisKeN^
Well Bowex is a big company and got money for a battleship
im going to turn my nomad bs into a unlawful character
it got a nomad licence so that guy who is responsible of those licences
please change it/give it to : Bowex-FisKeN^.Transport
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
have a nice day.
FisKeN^.
Escorts / merc's message dump - Dab - 08-16-2006
Hoodlum That WAS IC. Notice I put my name, and title in there. And I was speaking as the AW. So don't come in here and start bitching about AW making this thread go OOC. YOU started this on OOC. You started talking about OOC. I was replying as the AW about Alex06's character's business proposition. Your just, once again, going after me and AW, doing your usual **** again.
Escorts / merc's message dump - Nightfall - 08-16-2006
Message TO: Luciaden
Comm ID: Nightfall
Lord Captain, hold your horses!
I didn't see that signature at the end of the post either, it could have been easily overlooked. However, the post sounds like your usual posting anyway - when you post OOC.
I never saw an Aesir Lord Captain that has to have his word as the last. I don't have to remind you, kind sir, of Emperor Mech's words about what an Aesir Lord is. You should know that better than I do. It may not be mine to give free advices but I have to say what I think.
Bernard Fokke
Escorts / merc's message dump - marauder - 08-16-2006
***OOC***
And you had to start replying again, didn't you?
Just give it a rest ok?
If theres no 'To:', 'comm ID:' etc then people might assume it's OOC.
It's an honest enough mistake to make, so dab stop being so bloody paranoid.
I'll admit I too posted OOC without clearly mentioning it, but I still don't see why a nomad BS has been bought by a lawful company or is flying around with a lawful ID on it.
But whatever, it doesn't matter what I think.
Escorts / merc's message dump - Dab - 08-16-2006
I had thought the last sentence I posted sounded like a response would be from my character not myself. And it wasn't meant to be the last word, it was just meant to be a response to Alex' business advertisements. This part IS OOC however.
Escorts / merc's message dump - Nightfall - 08-16-2006
Dab, I meant this post or just scroll to nr. 75 or 4 posts up.
Escorts / merc's message dump - Dab - 08-16-2006
ID: Sigtryggr the Lucky
TO: Kolnatt The Iosvartr (Nightfall the Dark Horse for those of you who don't know his Norse name/Title)
One needs to do something, or at least act with honor to gain the respect of an Aesir Lord. When one acts with dishonor he is worthy of only contempt.
-Sigtryggr the Lucky
Aesir Lord,
Baron/Prince, of House Cammander.
(OOC: Didn't see your post Marauder. When I add my "signature" such as the one right above this one, it means I'm IC. Depending on what character I am using I change what comes first. As in this one I have Sigtryggr the Lucky as the top one, as I am talking as Sigtryggr the Lucky (my norse name and title) and I am an Aesir Lord. As well as the Prince and Baron of House Cammander [yes thats how its spelled]. If I were talking as Luciaden the lord captain. I'd have -Luciaden, Lord Captain of the Asgard Warriors,
Miralukan Survivor. So the signature will tell who I am being without having Comm ID. Sometimes I do not use the ID / To: As I'll make it clear who I am talking to in the paragraph, then in my sig it says who I am being. So check the bottom of the post to see if I'm OOC or IC. Though usually when I am OOC I make parenthesis and put OOC: before it. God this OOC turned out longer than I had meant it too.. :wacko: )