Discovery Gaming Community
Rosenkov Technology - INFO and FEEDBACK. - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+--- Thread: Rosenkov Technology - INFO and FEEDBACK. (/showthread.php?tid=124937)

Pages: 1 2


Rosenkov Technology - INFO and FEEDBACK. - Bretonian Turncoats - 01-20-2015

Rosenkov Technology

[Image: Sm_logo.png]

A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
—Antoine De Saint-Exupery


The Rosenkov Technology is a relatively small group of scientists and spatial engineers, whose goal is to improve existing or outdated tech in the Sirius Sector.

The Rosenkov came to life after one of a few Expos on the Planet Houston (late 821), in which various corporations, such as Ageira, Renzu or Kishiro, presented their own ideas and prototypes of civilian tech, such as new classes of Planetary Shuttles or civilian spaceships. Handful of the scientists however realized that a lot of used technology is dated, if not obsolete. Instead of getting rid of various old projects, they found out an another way: to buy out licenses and upgrade technology into something newer, more efficient and more reliable.


I
Five Directives

Directive 1: You are to represent the Rosenkov Technology.
Directive 2: Never fulfill or lead into unlawful acts.
Directive 3: Always cooperate with local authorities.
Directive 4: Act of corporate espionage is a crime.
Directive 5: Development of humanity is the priority.


II
Civilian Projects & Development
Total expenses: 38 000 000 SCr

Project A1: DB1-AR Drill Bits - Production Phase.
[[SECURED ARCHIVES: Ageira Innovations]]


III
Military Projects & Development
Total expenses: 0 SCr

Project M1: ASV-10Y Assault Service Vehicle - Blueprint Phase.

Project M2: LPX-02AT Repurposed Patriot Class - Blueprint Phase.


IV
Diplomacy

[Partnership]
---

[Friendly]
- Big Three
- Kishiro Technologies
- Gas Miners Guild
- Independent Miners Guild


[Neutral]
- Bounty Hunters Guild
- House Authorities
- House Corporations
- Hogosha Association
- Junker Factions
- Everyone not mentioned


[Hostile]
- Criminals
- Pirates
- Terrorists
- Infested
- Nomads



V
Temporal Validation Document

Tag: Rosenkov|
IFF: Interspace
ID: Interspace Commerce


VI
Other ocuments, joint operations, treaties
Development and License Agreement (Ageira Innovations and Rosenkov Technology)
Regarding: DR1-AR Space Mining Operations Drill Bit




RE: Rosenkov Technology - Pavel - 01-20-2015

That awkward moment when you get interested by faction's name thinking someone made Coalition "corporate" faction, click the thread, logo ensures you it's what you were looking for but in the end it's not what you thought it is.


Sorry for digression, that doesn't look bad though. Good luck.


RE: Rosenkov Technology - Vulkhard Muller - 01-20-2015

(01-20-2015, 11:15 PM)Pavel Wrote: That awkward moment when you get interested by faction's name thinking someone made Coalition "corporate" faction, click the thread, logo ensures you it's what you were looking for but in the end it's not what you thought it is.


Sorry for digression, that doesn't look bad though. Good luck.


Dont feel bad pavel legit same feeling

Ontopic:

Looks promising I will certainly follow where this goes


RE: Rosenkov Technology - Bretonian Turncoats - 01-20-2015

After some brainstorming, I have decided to change ID and IFF into Intespace Commerce to allow Rosenkov usage of the Libertonian and Bretonian tech. The fact that IC is more independent that Ageira, DSE and Universal was also convinceable enough.


RE: Rosenkov Technology - Omicron - 01-22-2015

I've had pleasant run-in with one of your own in Nagano today. Keep it up


RE: Rosenkov Technology - INFO and FEEDBACK. - Bretonian Turncoats - 01-28-2015

Updated:
- Title.
- Project statuses.
- Documents.


RE: Rosenkov Technology - INFO and FEEDBACK. - Outro - 02-05-2015

Very cool forum/ingame RP and ambitious leadership. Keep it up!


RE: Rosenkov Technology - INFO and FEEDBACK. - Bretonian Turncoats - 02-13-2015

Updated:
- New project (RP will be opened soon).


RE: Rosenkov Technology - INFO and FEEDBACK. - Thyrzul - 02-27-2015

I have been recently notified of this thread. What exactly makes you think that Rosenkov Technologies is among the select very few highly trusted allies of The Council to know about even the existence of Roussillon? I'm curious from where and why exactly you know about the system, because I can't recall having any contact with your corporation in the present or the past at all.



RE: Rosenkov Technology - INFO and FEEDBACK. - Bretonian Turncoats - 02-28-2015

(02-27-2015, 11:39 PM)Thyrzul Wrote:
I have been recently notified of this thread. What exactly makes you think that Rosenkov Technologies is among the select very few highly trusted allies of The Council to know about even the existence of Roussillon? I'm curious from where and why exactly you know about the system, because I can't recall having any contact with your corporation in the present or the past at all.

One of the tankers with supplies for the 343 and protected by one 343 vessel was lead (or rather, redirected) to the Yamaguchi in Roussillion, but was given only a low-security info regarding whole system. After a long chat with 343 officer, it became clear both Council and 343 needs more weaponry against, as far as I understand.

In short, RT was invited by 343 to supply Yamaguchi in Roussillion.

As a sidenote, I really wanted to remove that message, but the other replied, what made this message to not to be erased so easily ooRPly, as both requests to do so were rejected due to the fact someone replied. I agree it was a fault of mine, since Ageira shouldn't be a recepient there.


You can ask, with allowance of Ageira, to remove the CC, as it wasn't replied yet by the factual recepients. There should be no harm in rebooting it and I wouldn't whine about it (I'd be even more rather eager to remove it), as no roleplay actions have been taken yet.