+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: The Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Flood (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Thread: LOLTIC (/showthread.php?tid=126403)
LOLTIC - Alestone - 02-19-2015
Today
Then #1
Then #2
Then #3
RE: LOLTIC - Lythrilux - 02-19-2015
yes i know. shut up ok ;-;
In all serious, I really don't mind that they shot the POB. I could've just docked on Orbital.
It's weird. I saw this thread coming somehow.
RE: LOLTIC - Gytrash - 02-19-2015
(02-19-2015, 02:02 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: yes i know. shut up ok ;-;
In all serious, I really don't mind that they shot the POB. I could've just docked on Orbital.
It's weird. I saw this thread coming somehow.
Maaaaaaaaaaaaybe because you're being a hypocrite?
Just maybe?
When it inconveniences someone else it's all fine and dandy but the moment that thing inconveniences you then it's ALL HANDS ON DECK! TO THE COMPLAINT CANNONS!
PS. Yes I'm aware that I man the complaint cannons a lot, I've never said otherwise.
RE: LOLTIC - Lythrilux - 02-19-2015
Thanks Gytrash for giving me more material for my next sig.
RE: LOLTIC - Gytrash - 02-19-2015
You'd sure as hell better credit me in them.
Although the fact that you're so enamoured of the fact that you upset and annoy other players that you make their enraged posts into your signatures is indicative of you as a person.
RE: LOLTIC - Omi - 02-19-2015
(02-19-2015, 02:50 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: Thanks Gytrash for giving me more material for my next sig.
![[Image: giphy.gif?w=320]](http://media20.giphy.com/media/Kyr8OnKRKmDbG/giphy.gif?w=320)
RE: LOLTIC - Sylvie557 - 02-19-2015
In Lyth's defense, in the topic discussing shooting POBs was more about whether someone can be sanction about it. Lyth never said their can't be inRP consequences of it happening... I mean lolcore so bad
RE: LOLTIC - Gytrash - 02-19-2015
In denial of Lyth's defence he said, and I quote
(12-09-2014, 10:41 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: oh, so is this a "booo hoo my trader was killed by a pirate via x and it's unfair because of y" thread? Yeesh.
I'd congratulate the pirate: he was using his head in order to corner his prey.
Looking at it from other angles, I found this extremely useful for stopping 'crimminals' when I'm on my lawfuls if they try to dock on a POB whilst I'm in pursuit.
And as such.
I'd congratulate the pirate: he was using his head in order to corner his prey.
RE: LOLTIC - Sylvie557 - 02-19-2015
Again I don't see anywhere he seemed to mention inRP consequences. I am not the biggest fan of Core but right now you are just looking for excuses to be mad. Also the Sairs action did violate laws declared by the CoF about NFZ in that system.
RE: LOLTIC - Gytrash - 02-19-2015
As the laws stand the Corsairs were in the right (except for the indie battleship), they might need to be amended to make engaging other vessels outside of the classes stated against the laws but under gunship class can at present freely engage other vessels.
I'd know, I wrote them.