+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+---- Forum: Faction Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=46)
+----- Forum: Faction Review and Feedback (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=135)
+------ Forum: Archived Feedback Threads (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=484)
+------ Thread: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 (/showthread.php?tid=147306)
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - SMI-Great.Fox - 11-04-2017
(10-19-2017, 04:25 AM)SMI-Great.Fox Wrote:(09-26-2017, 09:29 AM)SMI-Great.Fox Wrote:(09-07-2017, 08:15 PM)SMI-Great.Fox Wrote:(09-03-2017, 09:03 PM)Tunicle Wrote: The discussion is with mods and admin revolve around battleships and ID.
A battleship and a battlecruiser (Was cruiser years ago) for a spec op ID with enough RP to be accepted.
If the issue is just over an ID, I'll take a Spec Op ID over an Oracle one then.
Has there been an update to this? It's been respectively nearly 20 days of patiently waiting.
I have contacted Skorak, Tuncile, and St. Dennis on this issue and have gotten zero response. I know you are all busy and I have waited 1 month and 15 days for an answer. Just letting you lot know.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - Shinju - 11-04-2017
Nothing has changed at all, seeing how some questions need months to be answered.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - SMI-Great.Fox - 11-09-2017
(11-04-2017, 12:12 PM)SMI-Great.Fox Wrote:(10-19-2017, 04:25 AM)SMI-Great.Fox Wrote:(09-26-2017, 09:29 AM)SMI-Great.Fox Wrote:(09-07-2017, 08:15 PM)SMI-Great.Fox Wrote: [quote='Tunicle' pid='1924808' dateline='1504469018']
The discussion is with mods and admin revolve around battleships and ID.
A battleship and a battlecruiser (Was cruiser years ago) for a spec op ID with enough RP to be accepted.
If the issue is just over an ID, I'll take a Spec Op ID over an Oracle one then.
Has there been an update to this? It's been respectively nearly 20 days of patiently waiting.
I have contacted Skorak, Tuncile, and St. Dennis on this issue and have gotten zero response. I know you are all busy and I have waited 1 month and 15 days for an answer. Just letting you lot know.
(11-04-2017, 12:26 PM)Shinju Wrote: Nothing has changed at all, seeing how some questions need months to be answered.
*sigh*
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - Stoner_Steve - 11-12-2017
I disagree with this sanction. The evidence the corsairs provided to the CoF inRP shows both offical zoners (IRG) and unoffical zoners attacking and being attacked by corsairs. The corsaris should be forced to fr5 all zoners in the same manner that IRG and OSI have to decide to fr5 all corsairs.
This is due to an admin imposed game mechanic. You see the indy zoner id does not have the necessary lines to enforce CoF law, which requires an offical zoner to be present.
My fear is that from this point forward OSI and IRG are going to have to debate who is going to show up to defend the Freeport and end up with a potential FR5 for doing so, due to an admin imposed game mechanic.
My suggestion is that the zoner id be allowed to enforce CoF law within the omicrons and/or systems not containing a jump gate
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - Zyliath - 11-12-2017
As the new Oracle 1iC, I'd like to remember you to give an answer to @SMI-Great.Fox in regards to his two SRP ships - Grande Guillotine and La Triomphante - and his request about their passage under the Oracle banners.
Send an answer at least.
You can't leave the guy pending more than 3 months like that, without the actual possibility to roleplay in these ships he spent credits and time on.
I shall await an answer from the Admins.
Well, you can wait, but pm sent to SMI. I am led to believe he was informed at the time, but now he has his answer.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - xiphos - 11-12-2017
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=135684&pid=1939950#pid1939950
About the Rheinland laws.
Is it possible to get a short overview on what was changed in Laws when you change them? Atleast the section that has changed would be nice. I remeber the Kusari Kaigun giving an insight, when they updated the laws of Kusari. It is not that interessting to read the whole law over and over again to find the changed section.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - SnakThree - 11-12-2017
(11-12-2017, 11:02 PM)xiphos Wrote: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=135684&pid=1939950#pid1939950
About the Rheinland laws.
Is it possible to get a short overview on what was changed in Laws when you change them? Atleast the section that has changed would be nice. I remeber the Kusari Kaigun giving an insight, when they updated the laws of Kusari. It is not that interessting to read the whole law over and over again to find the changed section.
Have you considered providing this feedback to governments? At least LibGov is planning to provide changelog soonish.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - Bundeskabinett Sekretariat - 11-12-2017
(11-12-2017, 11:02 PM)xiphos Wrote: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=135684&pid=1939950#pid1939950
About the Rheinland laws.
Is it possible to get a short overview on what was changed in Laws when you change them? Atleast the section that has changed would be nice. I remeber the Kusari Kaigun giving an insight, when they updated the laws of Kusari. It is not that interessting to read the whole law over and over again to find the changed section.
We run thread with copy of laws and changelog here.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - xiphos - 11-12-2017
(11-12-2017, 11:07 PM)SnakThree Wrote: Have you considered providing this feedback to governments? At least LibGov is planning to provide changelog soonish.
That's all nice and stuff. But have you considered, that the Government can't change anything in the Laws section? Right now only the Admins can change something about the laws. That's why i asked the admins. Because an Admin posted the Change in Rheinland Laws without a changelog.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread 2.0 - St.Denis - 11-12-2017
(11-12-2017, 11:24 PM)xiphos Wrote:(11-12-2017, 11:07 PM)SnakThree Wrote: Have you considered providing this feedback to governments? At least LibGov is planning to provide changelog soonish.
That's all nice and stuff. But have you considered, that the Government can't change anything in the Laws section? Right now only the Admins can change something about the laws. That's why i asked the admins. Because an Admin posted the Change in Rheinland Laws without a changelog.
What is the point in providing a Changelog, when the particular Government has already provided the information?