+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+---- Forum: Sanctions and Warnings (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=43)
+---- Thread: Player Sanctioned: Grudge.Keeper (/showthread.php?tid=150156)
Player Sanctioned: Grudge.Keeper - sindroms - 05-09-2017
Grudge.Keeper has been sanctioned for:
Consequences: Bastilled
Quote:1.1 Abusive, vulgar, obscene, political, racist, graphic, pornographic and law-violating materials
4.4 Every char must have only one type of ID equipped and they must play to that ID. Nomads are allowed to be engaged by all IDs. In all other cases where these restrictions and allowances conflict with the server rules, the ID overrides the rules
Consequences: Bastilled
How many oral attentions someone has dispatched is up to the player in question. We are, however, not really sure why is a bounty hunter shooting a LPI IDed player.
If you require evidence, you may request such via PM from a Staff member. Only the accused or an official faction leader of the accused person's faction may request such. Once you have the evidence, and if you wish to dispute it, you may post in the Sanction Thread below. Do not continue PM'ing a staff member, as that will result in your Appeal being denied. If you PM a staff or post in the sanction thread and you are not directly involved, you are consenting to be subjected to the reprisal of my choice which may involve in game repercussions up to a ban. Blaming members of your immediate family, neighbors, friends, pets, and assorted Orcs, Trolls and any other legendary creatures may result in the use of Admin Right #CTE 750AE
RE: Player Sanctioned: Grudge.Keeper - Reeves - 05-09-2017
I won't comment on the former statement since there was quite a bit of irp insults going back and forth, the only time the other individual seemed to take offense was when their attempt to hire a freelancer to shoot my hunter and a battleship they were with had opened fire, got them killed, such was the roleplay consequence given the proceedings. There was a good moment of time when the conversation ceased, but both the battleship and bomber in question continued to provoke a character with a short fuse. I'm all for seeing that ship fr5'd and punished accordingly for disavowing his contractual obligations. An apology was even tendered oorp, I will not argue on what the green course of action should be, but neither party is innocent here. I don't entirely see valid grounds to be punished for 1.1 when the insults were kept irp and they were more than capable of issuing insults in return, things along the line of my character's mother and calling him an animal pumped full of steroids, the logs of which I can submit. In the law we call this a case of "Ex turpi causa non oritur actio". An instance where the plaintiff violated the very standards they were seeking an action upon.
I will tender another apology and express sincere diligence to aim for mutually beneficial encounters again if required for the satisfaction of the person that filed this herein. Upon doing so I'd like to request for this punishment to be modified to a firm warning, given the willingness to adopt to the server environment properly after a talk with Denis. I was under the impression that the age rating of this server was largely mature. I've made note that is not the case and will amend the conduct of this character accordingly and hereby submit another sincere apology for the mutual misunderstanding.
If that is insufficient I humbly request to be notified of what would be sufficient given the circumstances and thereby mend the problem.
RE: Player Sanctioned: Grudge.Keeper - St.Denis - 06-06-2017
Ship has been released with its guns missing and the Bar Bill paid.