To: Council; From: Crayter Fleet Staff; Re: Equipment specification query [Courier] - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Communication Channel (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +--- Thread: To: Council; From: Crayter Fleet Staff; Re: Equipment specification query [Courier] (/showthread.php?tid=159610) |
To: Council; From: Crayter Fleet Staff; Re: Equipment specification query [Courier] - Panzer - 03-29-2018 Respected allies. I have recently been informed about the existence of a class of starship in your employ that would potentially be of great help in a number of operations we may or may not have in store. The information that reached me through a junior fleet officer's report indicates, that the craft is a converted predecessor to the modern Royal destroyer, adapted for use as a heavily armored troop carrier. What I would like to know is whether such craft exists, if it does - its exact specification and finally - how many of them might be available in the coming weeks for a joint operation? ~ Fleet Section Chief S-4 Gaetan Moliere
RE: To: Council; From: Crayter Fleet Staff; Re: Equipment specification query [Courier] - Thyrzul - 03-30-2018 Initialisation... Intensité du signal: ██████████ 100% Encodage: __________ ██████████ PLUS FORT Source: ________ Marne, Champagne Expéditeur: ____ Général Pierre LaFlamme Du Conseil ___ [C] Destinataire(s): Fleet Section Chief S-4 Gaetan Moliere =CR= Sujet: _________ Re: - Transmission entrée... Fleet Section Chief Moliere, The whole of the information you refer to does not match any of our ships, parts of it refers to various ships at our disposal. Perhaps if you could specify the source of information, or share a bit more details about which ship you want to know more about, I could help reconciling the discrepancies et provide further information. Sincèrement, Général Pierre LaFlamme Du Conseil Général en Chef Du Conseil Piéce(s) jointe(s):
● N/A RE: To: Council; From: Crayter Fleet Staff; Re: Equipment specification query [Courier] - Panzer - 03-31-2018 Upon some research, I am led to suspect, that perhaps the pilot in question referred to the Taureau-clas armored transports. The main issue at hand is - we are in fact planning a high-risk spaceborne assault upon a target I believe we both want addressed sooner, rather than later. That is the main reason for which I am investigating any and all possible ways of reducing casualties. Initially, we had intended to employ the Celestra: We do have these available, numbering in the hundreds - as the most commonly employed fleet logistics vessel as well as civilian levy. While these f have indeed been designed with boarding and planetary assualt in mind, news of something potentially better fielded by our allies did spark my interest. On paper, the Taureau is better-armed, with two extra turrets, rated at three times the hull integrity and with over twice the cargo capacity compared to a celestra - which itself is the most maneuverable ship in its class and costs only a sixth what each taureau does. I'd welcome an estimate from your end on which ship would be better-suited for "you-know-what" task. ~ Fleet Section Chief S-4 Gaetan Moliere
RE: To: Council; From: Crayter Fleet Staff; Re: Equipment specification query [Courier] - Thyrzul - 04-06-2018 Initialisation... Intensité du signal: ██████████ 100% Encodage: __________ ██████████ PLUS FORT Source: ________ Marne, Champagne Expéditeur: ____ Général Pierre LaFlamme Du Conseil ___ [C] Destinataire(s): Fleet Section Chief S-4 Gaetan Moliere =CR= Sujet: _________ Re: - Transmission entrée... Fleet Section Chief Moliere, I'm not sure who your sources are, but I wouldn't really call them accurate. The Taureau-class Assault Transport is not a predecessor of the Triumph-class Destroyer, is not even anywhere near the size of the latter, et while years ago we had better access to them, due to the more recent regulations et more stern restrictions of the Kingdom's domestic authorities acquisition of the craft is virtually impossible for us at this moment. The Council utilizes several alternatives of various sizes, primary roles et capacities for transporting our troops, in order to provide a proper advice I would need to know more details about what exact plans you have in mind. In case you ask me to chose from only the two options you've presented, due to technical reasons I outlined above I would recommend using the clearly abundant Celestra-class transports. Sincèrement, Général Pierre LaFlamme Du Conseil Général en Chef Du Conseil Piéce(s) jointe(s):
● N/A RE: To: Council; From: Crayter Fleet Staff; Re: Equipment specification query [Courier] - Panzer - 04-06-2018 The commander in chief has authorized me to release the following analysis to perhaps facilitate joint planning. We intend to at least capture and fortify planet harris, use it as a staging point against Royal supply lines. Unfortunately, this goal's feasibility is impossible to estimate, for our efforts to determine the strength of Royal defenses planetside (And therefore the force needed to handle them) did not produce any results whatsoever. I doubt I need to point out the importance of prewar lanes in Tau-31 - cutting that highway would leave the Royal fleets in California with only one, open-space supply route. It may be ambitious to expect liberating tau-31 whole, but perhaps - it is not? That being said - I am asking whether you'd consider participating in a joint operation to that effect. Quote: ~ Fleet Section Chief S-4 Gaetan Moliere
|