+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Site & Forum Feedback (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: New forum structure (/showthread.php?tid=160)
New forum structure - Igiss - 09-25-2005
As you might've already noticed, the Discovery Gaming Community forums structure has changed. Discovery Gaming section is now 4th below Discovery HQ, The Elder Scrolls and Freelancer sections. Those who visit the forum for the 1st time should see forums dedicated to specific games instead of general ones. This does not mean that general gaming forums are not important, but it's usually specific games that attract visitors to forum.
That's my explanation... maybe I'm wrong, that's why I started this poll. I'd like to hear your opinions on this.
There are also several other changes on our forums - the board name is different now, "Discovery Gaming Community - The Elder Scrolls & Freelancer Forums" instead of "Discovery Gaming Community". Arwen's Morrowind Forums redirect is now a subforum, not a forum.
New forum structure - metamay - 09-25-2005
I like how it is so I voted leave it, but I really don't mind one way or the other. I'm not too crazy about the name change (edit: it's too long) but if it attracts more people then it's fine. Do what you think best I say. :)
New forum structure - Cecasander - 09-26-2005
I think it shouldn't change, but maybe you should make a link to the different forums on the top of the page?
New forum structure - Igiss - 09-26-2005
I don't quite understand the votes because I've already moved the gaming forums, and if you vote "No" and post "leave it as it is" it seems a bit illogical :P
About the name - yes, you are probably right, it's more convenient to make it shorter. Search engines would love a long name... but this board is not solely for search engines, right?
New forum structure - Igiss - 09-27-2005
New structure confirmed. So be it. One vote agains the new variant was a mistake, so it's 4 vs 1.