RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, 6PM UTC - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Server Events (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=411) +---- Forum: Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=28) +---- Thread: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, 6PM UTC (/showthread.php?tid=201352) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, 6PM UTC - Barrier - 01-07-2024 With the vagaries of gravitometric anomalies, the hold of Rheinland and Bretonia on the Omegas has weakened due to the loss of Gran Canaria as a staging point. Additionally, the unlawful elements in both Houses have managed to deal blows to the respective Forces which preclude aggressive expansionism. However, by the same token, the situation inside House space has remained relatively stable in recent months, with new strategical lines being drawn and maintained for the time being. Due to continuing importance of securing existing Omega assets, and shift has began to start dedicating more forces to their patrol. Both Silver and Diamond resources must be safeguarded by constant patrols, as the Military has already attempted with grave results. A related issue in this relative time of peace are the fears of disarmament, and the resulting loss of experience of active service members who actually participated in fleet engagements. To solve these problems, a joint initiative has been created by the admirals of both Forces, aiming to solve the prevailing issues with one broad stroke. Combat Area & Disposition
The upcoming event will take place in Omega 3.The meeting points for the exercises are Planet Sprague in Omega 3, and Solarius Station in Omega 11. Objectives
Rules
Date & Time of the event
Sunday, Jan 14, 6PM UTC.Participants
Please share any feedback you have, or reply with your character name and ship class to sign up. RE: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, Time TBD - tommygun209 - 01-07-2024 RHC-Hagen - Oder Also, can you please add the rule line preventing the "dead" ships from re-engaging their opponents? RE: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, Time TBD - JadeTornado - 01-07-2024 KKS-Bussard - RM Oder RE: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, Time TBD - 0xCosmin - 01-07-2024 Felfire - RM bomber RE: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, Time TBD - Barrier - 01-07-2024 (01-07-2024, 08:13 PM)tommygun209 Wrote: RHC-Hagen - Oder I was thinking that this will be decided by the people on the scene. Of course in a regular fleet battle that will be the default rule, but in a more messy FFA or some other scenario it could be allowed. I'll clarify this though. RE: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, Time TBD - [MHS] - 01-07-2024 Hello and thank for all your efforts [RM]KKS-Mainz RE: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, Time TBD - Chenzo- - 01-07-2024 HMS-Fantasia - Dunkirk RE: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, Time TBD - Tenshi Kuonji - 01-07-2024 If you allow an London Interdictor, SDF-Excalibur would like to bring it, it is a BIS ID Ship ... If not allowed (but still we could want it) maybe i will send Winter_Snow for practice thing RE: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, Time TBD - rwx - 01-07-2024 8pm Reserve RM bomber Paul.Bommel RE: RM "vs" BAF | The Omega Initiative | Sun Jan 14, Time TBD - Barrier - 01-07-2024 (01-07-2024, 11:25 PM)Tenshi Kuonji Wrote: If you allow an London Interdictor, SDF-Excalibur would like to bring it, it is a BIS ID Ship ... I would clear that with the BAF faction leadership regarding a BIS id. From the RM side I'm fine with Winter_Snow being part of the RM contingent seeing as it participated in many fleet actions in the past. |