+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Site & Forum Feedback (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: Member titles (/showthread.php?tid=34)
Member titles - Igiss - 06-25-2005
I'd like to ask your advice on the ranking system for the forum. No one has lots of posts here yet, but this may change in future. So, here's the current system, quite simple:
Newbie - 0
Cool Newbie - 10
Pilgrim - 25
Rogue - 50
Ranger - 100
Warrior - 150
Assassin - 200
Knight - 300
Lord - 500
Should we change it on the whole, or partly?
Member titles - metamay - 06-25-2005
I don't really care about postcount or titles, but I think it looks good the way it is. It can always be funnier or cooler but just don't make it so you gain new titles for every 4 posts you make... :cool:
Member titles - Elvalia - 06-26-2005
Um the post counts for some of the higher ranks seem kind of low, I know on other boards you have to get like 3000 posts or something to get the top rank. My suggestion would be:
Newbie - 0
Cool Newbie - 10
Pilgrim - 25
Rogue - 50
Ranger - 100
Warrior - 150
Assassin - 300
Knight - 800
Lord - 1500
Just a suggestion though
Member titles - Igiss - 06-28-2005
Elvalia you are right, but I'd rather introduce 1 or 2 new titles somewhere between 500-1500 to make the system more logical. I'll think about it later... when post count of some members will get near 400-500.
Member titles - Cecasander - 07-09-2005
Well, you can add baron, viscount, marquis, margrave, earl, count, duke, grand-duke, arch-duke, king and emperor ofcourse :)
Member titles - Igiss - 07-10-2005
No kings or emperors, i'm the king, i'm the emperor, power corrupts :P
In spite (or maybe because) of my corruptedness I will steal some of your ideas Cecasander.
Member titles - xit - 07-10-2005
As long as I can become the Duke, then I'm happy. :yahoo: