To Monsieur Hawthrone - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Communication Channel (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +--- Thread: To Monsieur Hawthrone (/showthread.php?tid=81668) |
To Monsieur Hawthrone - Outlander - 06-06-2012 Monsieur Hawthrone. A few moments ago we went informed by a member of Deep Space Engineering over a change in your laws, forcing us to divert several cargo ships bound for Planet Pittsburg to stop at the Les Liberty border and return to friendly space. We were informed that our craft were no longer permitted within les liberty under no exceptions, despite no hostilities given and furthermore no reason whatsoever to bar them in such. We wasted quite a bit of fuel to send such cargo only to turn around, such we do not have easy access to. I am now having to deal with r informing our lord on the problem in such, and I can assure you he shall not be happy. Can you please explain to me the reasons in such in which we our trading vessels are therefore unable to continue progress with our main sirian trading partner? Paul du Champ To Monsieur Hawthrone - The Republic Of Liberty - 06-07-2012 Paul du Champ; The law was always this way. I suspect I know which part of the law you are referring to, and I can provide you the previous version of it along with the new one. There has been no change in its substance: Before Wrote: After Wrote: If you were dealing directly with Deep Space Engineering on Planet Pittsburgh, by all means continue to do so. Your status has not changed, and if you found yourself welcome before as unofficial shippers and traffic at Planet Pittsburgh, you will likely continue to be the same in the present and future. If you were referring to something else, I can help you with that matter as well. - William Hawthorne, Secretary of State for Trade and Economics.
To Monsieur Hawthrone - Outlander - 06-07-2012 Monsieur Hawthrone. Allow moi to state mon interpretations on such if I may. Due to such as you say, we are allowed continued permittance through les liberty as we have been? And in such, with the current trading vessels in which we use? Paul du Champ |