(07-21-2018, 07:42 PM)Saronsen Wrote: why you're charging $5,000,000 credits for a cargo they're going to make 0 profit from at their end destination
Neither here nor there as PoBs pay varying amounts for commodities I do normally pirate for much less but that's the way the RP went on this one. Typically starting at 5 and then having the bartering RP around the fee is probably my favorite part of the encounter.
(07-21-2018, 07:49 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: Apparently this was a misunderstanding regarding the PvP-death rules for traders. The player thought he was still allowed to trade even when PvP death, while this would have only been a thing if he was PvP-dead by combat-docking. Thank you for understanding, Runescape-Sword!
That makes total sense, it's not a super straightforward rule, thank you for resolving the feedback.
Rule 2.5 has been enforced in ebbs and flows over the years, with some character names being overlooked and others forced to rename. While it quotes rule 1.4, this sanction and the rule quoted are relevant enough to the character of Bob Kelso, which appears to have been in use for some time.
Quote:1.4 - All character, faction, ship or station names must be easily readable and roleplay appropriate. The use of profanity, country tags, memes, pop-culture references, non-English letters, or excess symbols is not allowed. For examples, see here.
2.5 - Characters that are ponies, furries, or direct imports (characters taken from other franchises) are not allowed.
Referring to this (correctly applied) sanction as an accurate interpretation of the server rules, using Bob Kelso, the name of a main character from the Scrubs TV series, on Discovery Freelancer is against the server rules. The usage of a picture of the actor who portrays Bob Kelso, Ken Jenkins, from what looks like it may be a Scrubs publicity shoot, is arguably a bigger deal than the aforementioned sanctioned character, which is just a name without such a picture.
Obviously I'm writing a feedback post rather than running to the report button, but considering the above, this character surely cannot be used in this way and should be renamed.