Stryker Fighter

[Dusty Lens]

Can we get an in-game shot/size comparison?

A few images, or a video preferably, of the shape would be excellent. Chiefly due to some concern over a Falcattaish balloon/clay look that the model may possess.

That being said, if the model is actually found to be of higher quality, replacing a vessel like the cupholder... Which is essentially the exact same ship as this one save more primitive... Would strike me as a worthier move than replacing a perfectly fine vanilla model with a redundant fighter.

[teschy]

As for making one a VHF and the other a HF... It is not logical since both ships have the same shape, size and gun points.

Isn't that how the current Avenger and Executioner are like? >_>

---

https://i.imgur.com/GcDsaNC.gif
https://i.imgur.com/rB3kqGS.png
https://i.imgur.com/rB3kqGS.png
https://i.imgur.com/scTMUZH.gif

Signature violates 1.7, please resize:
1.7 - Pictures that exceed 700px width or signatures that exceed 700*250px*3 MB are not allowed on the forum.
Mephistoles

[McNeo]

Navy spec ops uses golden ships.

Im probably the only one but Im sensing something not quite right with the model/texture. I think it might need a 'cleaner' texture if it stays as smooth as it is now.

Replacing the Avenger is also probably not a good idea.
What this -could- be however is the follow up non-defective model based on the Phantom VHF (formerly the LSF Ravenclaw).

But it would need Yue Fei's original clean black texture (with a few tweaks) for that, I think.

[Sturmwind]

Would work as an LSF bomber, with the darker texture variation. I wouldn't like to see the current Upholder being replaced, personally.

[Korolia]

To answer a few points;
-I might turn the LSF model so it only has one single vertical fin to make it different, it shouldn't be a very hard modification to the original.
-The textures used are vanilla defender texture, modified (LMC one uses a somewhat greyer one while LSF uses a black one.)
-Because I was asked only to texture the ship, I know not what would the stats be.
-I did considered it would be a fine replacement to redundant HF class fighters that nobody seems to use right now - replacing their stats and infocard shouldn't be very hard

---

There is no bathroom!

[tansytansey]

It looks too roundish for my tastes. Kind of like the sausage Falcata. The smoothness is also distorting the textures, giving it a rather ugly appearance. If you've applied smoothing or something to it, I'd recommend taking it off.

---

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.

[Korolia]

Again, I did -not- do the model, only textured it.

---

There is no bathroom!

[jimmy Patterson]

id say add it new as a fighter variant of the upholder maybe infocard it as a field modification like what was common with ww2 era soviet/British/German fighters that the corps/LSF adopted to better use the resources they have

---

kudos tommeh for sig

[Saronsen]

FYI Yue Fei/Xing made that ship.

http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll166/e...nstitre-1-5.png

I'll say yes, Korolia did texture it though.

---

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2330091
Time left: (Permanent)

[Dusty Lens]

Ah HA

I knew I had seen that ship before.