(05-11-2018, 09:47 PM)Schwi Wrote: Let me clarify something concerning the facts stated above - you were wrecked not because you were going to face a clearly overwhelming force or because you were showing off and pretending it to be a bold move. You got wrecked because you came in a gunboat and was clearly going to interfere the event.
We have just removed the potential opportunity of such outcome when it didn't work to resolve into a more peaceful way.
The method for removing me was by actually destroying my vessel, My reason for being at the event was stated above. You engaged me because I was a hostile variable to your operations. Thats just how unlawfuls should treat lawfuls. But also looking at the context of the event, thats my job as a lawful to be there and protect the assets of the station. Especially within such a lawful zone.
How I think that sentence should be written as, is:
Quote:You got engaged because you came in a gunboat and was clearly going to interfere the event. You were wrecked because you were going to face a clearly overwhelming force or because you were showing off and pretending it to be a bold move.
First comes the reason for engagement, the latter is the method used. Both are true.