Nah, I used the flagrant words because I was frustrated over the issue at hand. However, I was not insulted by it. Also, the Admiral called Mr Crow a liar. He didn't ask for the Junkers to speed up their research gathering or even realise that they had just lost over 7000 people and might need slightly longer than the killers to get their evidence in order. You realise that not waiting for the mourning of family members to subside and simply telling them that they are liars, will cause said family members to get highly angry at you. And because I find that perfectly acceptable role-play, I can now say that my character indeed acted right.
I simply don't understand the jump to calling Mr Crow a liar. You can say that Kusari and other forces had already collected all their evidence but that doesn't answer the question. That doesn't make Mr Crow a liar. You cannot say you are waiting for the other side to have their say if you call them a liar. To call someone a liar means you have already made up your mind.
Basically, if you said," Mr Crow, I think you are lying. Please bring me evidence to prove I am wrong."
I could live with it. But you called him a flat out liar. Am I being unreasonable with my view here? I really don't think I am.