So is it still against the rules to fly around with a ship that has components intentionally blown off? An admin ruled eons ago that it was abusing game mechanics, and I was wondering if that's still the case
(01-11-2014, 08:08 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: I believe this is a moot point since destroying components is no longer possible. If it was, however, then yes, the rule would still be in effect.
(01-11-2014, 08:08 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: I believe this is a moot point since destroying components is no longer possible. If it was, however, then yes, the rule would still be in effect.
Really? What happened to that?
There was a significant issue in balance between fighters that had multiple components (ie. bits that could be broken off) compared to non-vanilla fighters, none of which had destroyable components. Hull damage from AoE weapons (missiles) hit multiple components per shot for stacked damage, which was not intended, as it made them far too vulnerable to missiles compared to other fighters. Therefore, all fighters were changed to be one single component (the actual hull).
Posts: 3,604
Threads: 326
Joined: Aug 2012
Staff roles: Server Administrator
(01-11-2014, 08:08 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: I believe this is a moot point since destroying components is no longer possible. If it was, however, then yes, the rule would still be in effect
Erm I don't think that's true (unless I'm being miss guided here). I was in a fight with some RFP, sairs and hessians and somehow they all managed to blow off every single weapon, thruster and all of that stuff. I was just left with a CD
(01-11-2014, 08:08 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: I believe this is a moot point since destroying components is no longer possible. If it was, however, then yes, the rule would still be in effect
Erm I don't think that's true (unless I'm being miss guided here). I was in a fight with some RFP, sairs and hessians and somehow they all managed to blow off every single weapon, thruster and all of that stuff. I was just left with a CD