(04-17-2019, 07:28 PM)Nepotu Wrote: SNAC nerf was necessary
"IT kills balance. fly on the trashy snubs"
Everything that opposes the mighty VHF must be eliminated! Want to have fun? NO! This is a no fun zone
This isn't about VHFs, this thread is about you and your very fragile ego that is likely being shattered a multitude of times being forced to adapt to playing differently. Let's not make this about things that it clearly doesn't concern, this isn't about balance and this is isn't about some grand conspiracy. This thread is motivated purely by what you - personally want. And what you want, by your own logic, is for bombers to be King again. To have anti-cap and potent anti-fighter capability. Both of which they still retain because WEWLAD scatter-guns. But you can't be asked to break your one-trick pony tendencies can you?
I've seen both sides of this argument. The pro-snac players who tell you not to joust bombers and to go evasive when your shields drop, funny thing is they also happen to be the very same people who will //oorp scold you for doing this. This is the basic mentality behind the people that heavily relied on the gimmick. Did Antonio quit the game over the SNAC nerf? No. He just played other ships and used other weapons, instead of using his videos as an example of cool things that will never happen again, reflect on his adaptability.
I have no problem with bombers getting the SNAC back, but the scatter-gun potency would have to be SEVERELY nerfed to make-up for bombers having an insta-kill weapon again. Those few months where you both had ridiculously powerful scatter-guns and the original SNAC were extremely tedious for anyone flying a snub that didn't happen to be a bomber. The balance plug-in was likely a response to the unpleasant nature of such a combination.
I hear all these people complain that SNACs are useless now, but I still find myself often using a SNAC bomber as my ship of choice when fighting caps. Scatter-guns give you more than enough anti-snub potential, threads like this make me laugh at the fickle nature of people. You accuse the rest of us of being biased to VHFs and yet here you are, being wholly and utterly biased towards your gimmick and preferred ship of choice that received a balance adjustment.
The fact stands that now bombers are doing what bombers are meant to do, they bomb larger ships and require the protection of fighters. Until you start highlighting actual gameplay reasons beyond "HURR DURR MUH META", nobody is going to take you or your horribly kept beard seriously.
(04-17-2019, 07:28 PM)Nepotu Wrote: SNAC nerf was necessary
"IT kills balance. fly on the trashy snubs"
Everything that opposes the mighty VHF must be eliminated! Want to have fun? NO! This is a no fun zone
This isn't about VHFs, this thread is about you and your very fragile ego that is likely being shattered a multitude of times being forced to adapt to playing differently. Let's not make this about things that it clearly doesn't concern, this isn't about balance and this is isn't about some grand conspiracy. This thread is motivated purely by what you - personally want. And what you want, by your own logic, is for bombers to be King again. To have anti-cap and potent anti-fighter capability. Both of which they still retain because WEWLAD scatter-guns. But you can't be asked to break your one-trick pony tendencies can you?
I've seen both sides of this argument. The pro-snac players who tell you not to joust bombers and to go evasive when your shields drop, funny thing is they also happen to be the very same people who will //oorp scold you for doing this. This is the basic mentality behind the people that heavily relied on the gimmick. Did Antonio quit the game over the SNAC nerf? No. He just played other ships and used other weapons, instead of using his videos as an example of cool things that will never happen again, reflect on his adaptability.
I have no problem with bombers getting the SNAC back, but the scatter-gun potency would have to be SEVERELY nerfed to make-up for bombers having an insta-kill weapon again. Those few months where you both had ridiculously powerful scatter-guns and the original SNAC were extremely tedious for anyone flying a snub that didn't happen to be a bomber. The balance plug-in was likely a response to the unpleasant nature of such a combination.
I hear all these people complain that SNACs are useless now, but I still find myself often using a SNAC bomber as my ship of choice when fighting caps. Scatter-guns give you more than enough anti-snub potential, threads like this make me laugh at the fickle nature of people. You accuse the rest of us of being biased to VHFs and yet here you are, being wholly and utterly biased towards your gimmick and preferred ship of choice that received a balance adjustment.
The fact stands that now bombers are doing what bombers are meant to do, they bomb larger ships and require the protection of fighters. Until you start highlighting actual gameplay reasons beyond "HURR DURR MUH META", nobody is going to take you or your horribly kept beard seriously.
So you were one of the crying snowflakes that were getting butthurt when they were SNACed. Noted
(04-17-2019, 11:05 PM)Couden Wrote: "IT kills balance. fly on the trashy snubs"
Everything that opposes the mighty VHF must be eliminated! Want to have fun? NO! This is a no fun zone
This isn't about VHFs, this thread is about you and your very fragile ego that is likely being shattered a multitude of times being forced to adapt to playing differently. Let's not make this about things that it clearly doesn't concern, this isn't about balance and this is isn't about some grand conspiracy. This thread is motivated purely by what you - personally want. And what you want, by your own logic, is for bombers to be King again. To have anti-cap and potent anti-fighter capability. Both of which they still retain because WEWLAD scatter-guns. But you can't be asked to break your one-trick pony tendencies can you?
I've seen both sides of this argument. The pro-snac players who tell you not to joust bombers and to go evasive when your shields drop, funny thing is they also happen to be the very same people who will //oorp scold you for doing this. This is the basic mentality behind the people that heavily relied on the gimmick. Did Antonio quit the game over the SNAC nerf? No. He just played other ships and used other weapons, instead of using his videos as an example of cool things that will never happen again, reflect on his adaptability.
I have no problem with bombers getting the SNAC back, but the scatter-gun potency would have to be SEVERELY nerfed to make-up for bombers having an insta-kill weapon again. Those few months where you both had ridiculously powerful scatter-guns and the original SNAC were extremely tedious for anyone flying a snub that didn't happen to be a bomber. The balance plug-in was likely a response to the unpleasant nature of such a combination.
I hear all these people complain that SNACs are useless now, but I still find myself often using a SNAC bomber as my ship of choice when fighting caps. Scatter-guns give you more than enough anti-snub potential, threads like this make me laugh at the fickle nature of people. You accuse the rest of us of being biased to VHFs and yet here you are, being wholly and utterly biased towards your gimmick and preferred ship of choice that received a balance adjustment.
The fact stands that now bombers are doing what bombers are meant to do, they bomb larger ships and require the protection of fighters. Until you start highlighting actual gameplay reasons beyond "HURR DURR MUH META", nobody is going to take you or your horribly kept beard seriously.
So you were one of the crying snowflakes that were getting butthurt when they were SNACed. Noted
And this attitude is why your arguments will never be capable of attracting sympathy. Thank you for proving my point sir.
I don't give 2 dimes about your sympathy or of anyone elses. This is the attitude I have after everyone's response is "no", "git gud" or other idiotic response like these
(04-17-2019, 07:28 PM)Nepotu Wrote: No one has the brains to at least come with some arguments, pertinent arguments
(04-18-2019, 03:43 AM)Nepotu Wrote: So you were one of the crying snowflakes that were getting butthurt when they were SNACed. Noted
OwO
I will state that we've fought on the server twice(I was Arizona.Ranger) and both times you've not enjoyed losing despite having the original SNAC gimmick on your side. You ran both times, and yet here you come with all your pride and accuse me of being the one crying about loss. What absolute hypocrisy. I'm not even disappointed, this is genuinely amusing to watch. You unravel at the drop of a hat and have absolutely no dignity.
You can't expect people to compromise with you and agree to your suggestions if you lash out at them for disagreeing with you. All you'll do is achieve the opposite result. But alright, stay in that bubble of yours it's just sad and oddly amusing to watch it pop and drop you flat on your face.