I think the old incident of New Tokyo Itabashi pob set up a precedent that justified the team decision to not do iff changes. (ksp defense base sold to hogosha, shot at traders and "neutrals" that hogosha didn't like, solved by being sold to samura). I only saw it in the end period with samura iff.
(03-10-2020, 06:44 AM)Typrop Wrote: He called the concept of sanctionlancer cancerous.
Yes, with the implication that my suggestion either was or would lead to sanctionlancer. Play again soon!
A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay,
brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.
(03-11-2020, 01:51 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote: Yes, with the implication that my suggestion either was or would lead to sanctionlancer. Play again soon!
More rules lead to an increased chance of violating any one rule, thus lending to the conclusion that yes, in fact, it would lead to sanctionlancer as you broaden the definition of "unacceptable" behavior.
User was banned for: They will know.
Time left: (Permanent)
(04-17-2020, 09:03 AM)Groshyr Wrote: Core-5 pob brtttt to Theta
Should you speak about Nichol's Trade Center (the OSI-Main-Base), you may ask the Faction-Owner how this happens.
And a part of the truth is, that PoB's was moved in the past, when the Dev's changed something.
And a Change like that has defently happen in the old Location (Omega 49).
The IFF wasn't change in this Prozess.