|
This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ash"
(→Albatross review misleading: new section) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
It's pretty fantastic, well done. Should fit in nicely as a clear RP section. I'd be happy to use it. | It's pretty fantastic, well done. Should fit in nicely as a clear RP section. I'd be happy to use it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===Update=== | ||
| + | Have a look at [[Template:Review]]. Use if you wish.<br/> | ||
| + | See it in use at [[Advanced Train]].<br/> | ||
| + | Lots of reviews will be listed at [[:Category:Reviews]]<br/> | ||
| + | Enjoy. :)[[User:Chovynz| ~Chovynz~ ]] <sup>([[User_talk:Chovynz|Blabs]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chovynz|Ego]]) (Wiki Admin) </sup> 15:09, 2 October 2009 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Albatross review misleading == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The review for the [[Albatross - CT-39X Civilian Transport]] kind of sounds like the ship was more expensive than a [[Mammoth]], which is wrong when ignoring package price. The Albatross package (11,263,750) includes five transport turrets, which would increase the Mammoths cost to 11,625,000 credits. --[[User:Skasi|Skasi]] 17:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:16, 5 July 2011
Thanks for contributing to the wiki. Could you please use the format outlined in the System Style Guide. Thanks, Tazuras 15:03, 26 June 2009 (MDT)
- Having looked at it, the code for the system info box is really rather awful. Im going to try and fux it now. Just hold off on making any more systems till I do. Thanks, Tazuras 18:00, 26 June 2009 (MDT)
- Ok, all fixed, please use it now. If you dont think it is appropriate and that is why you have not been using it please let us know so we can discuss it. Thanks again, Tazuras 18:48, 26 June 2009 (MDT)
Please sign your comments by using:
~~~~
--Tazuras 12:37, 29 June 2009 (MDT)
Just testing Ash 13:15, 29 June 2009 (MDT)Ash
Ship Reviews
If your not good with templates I'll try and work on one later for you to suit your needs. Also be sure to change the title of the review sections to something like:
Review <small>by: [[Chad Jones]]</small>
--Tazuras 12:21, 4 July 2009 (MDT)
I looked at some of the templates and found a new one, look at the pirate transport pgae to see what i mean. I think it fits alright. Still not sure about the freelancer writing though. Ash 12:25, 4 July 2009 (MDT)Ash
- What about the writing? And yeah, that looks good except the template is pretty bad, no padding, etc, but I will try and work on that later. --Tazuras 12:28, 4 July 2009 (MDT)
Heh, you did exactly waht i was thinking making it a reviews section. --Tazuras 12:26, 4 July 2009 (MDT)
Bonus, sorted. Will try and rearrange the writing a bit more now to fit the roleplay.
Let me know what you think of the flavor text template I have been working on and if you might want to use it: Flavor text WiP Thanks, Tazuras 09:55, 9 July 2009 (MDT)
It's pretty fantastic, well done. Should fit in nicely as a clear RP section. I'd be happy to use it.
Update
Have a look at Template:Review. Use if you wish.
See it in use at Advanced Train.
Lots of reviews will be listed at Category:Reviews
Enjoy. :) ~Chovynz~ (Blabs • Ego) (Wiki Admin) 15:09, 2 October 2009 (MDT)
Albatross review misleading
The review for the Albatross - CT-39X Civilian Transport kind of sounds like the ship was more expensive than a Mammoth, which is wrong when ignoring package price. The Albatross package (11,263,750) includes five transport turrets, which would increase the Mammoths cost to 11,625,000 credits. --Skasi 17:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
