Discovery Gaming Community
Technocracy of Auxo - Feedback - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Inter-House (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=69)
+----- Forum: A/)- Technocracy of Auxo (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=311)
+----- Thread: Technocracy of Auxo - Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=142072)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41


RE: A/) - Feedback - Vendetta - 03-27-2017

(03-27-2017, 07:45 PM)Dave.Synk Wrote: So basically if you come in three gunboats let's say and if we have alts more powerful, according to that, we can come in full force to outnumber your GB/cruiser ?

PS: I don't think it's right sometimes to change to powerful ships, because you have meta information about the presence of someone, so you are sure he has no chance and so on. This is a problem of balance now. Unless, you had an a priori contact with him and you are aware of what capabilities he had.

Meta information is not information provided by someone who was present at the scene asking for something larger. We were outnumbered and did what was necessary to succeed.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Dave Synk - 03-27-2017

So it's a means to an end basically. Alright.


RE: A/) - Feedback - nOmnomnOm - 03-27-2017

You guys just cant seem to give fair fights, now can you?
http://i.imgur.com/6okDBAL.png - So 2 gunboats coming just because you guys were loosing in a snub pew and after your original GB died.

Here is more links. I'll let the screens speak for themselves here.

http://i.imgur.com/z8PGySj.jpg - 1st death message (which he later came back just becasue you needed that extra help so badly, didnt you?)
http://i.imgur.com/CdmvcMK.png -1st gunboat in the fight
http://imgur.com/a/qzYkb - 2nd GB and 3rd on it's way, eh? Nice load-out.
http://imgur.com/a/fuZ3V - Poor sportsmanship after you guys ganked. 10/10 quality official faction.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Vendetta - 03-27-2017

(03-27-2017, 08:13 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: You guys just cant seem to give fair fights, now can you?
http://i.imgur.com/6okDBAL.png - So 2 gunboats coming just because you guys were loosing in a snub pew and after your original GB died.

Here is more links. I'll let the screens speak for themselves here.

http://i.imgur.com/z8PGySj.jpg - 1st death message (which he later came back just becasue you needed that extra help so badly, didnt you?)
http://i.imgur.com/CdmvcMK.png -1st gunboat in the fight
http://imgur.com/a/qzYkb - 2nd GB and 3rd on it's way, eh? Nice load-out.
http://imgur.com/a/fuZ3V - Poor sportsmanship after you guys ganked. 10/10 quality official faction.

Please defer your attention to post 9 and post 199.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Enyalius - 03-27-2017

(03-27-2017, 08:13 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: http://i.imgur.com/z8PGySj.jpg - 1st death message (which he later came back just becasue you needed that extra help so badly, didnt you?)



Please note that the person who killed has departed the game, which allowed me to come back. since it was only Banshee who killed me and no one else was involved by the Rules i can return, so i did. Sorry if that caused an inconvenience for you


Here is my proof.

Rule 4.4 If the attacker(s) log off, you may re-enter the system you died in.


Sorry for barging in on Aux Feedback.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 03-27-2017

You had a wilde helping you, a solaris boat that came in, and 3 other AFC snubs, one guy being pretty decent at aiming on two snubs and a GB that's terrible against fighters. That Gunboat in Kansas was moving the ship back where it should be, as it was mislocated.

[Image: pK26K7x.png]

Please refer to the guidelines of the first post and please do not slander.



RE: A/) - Feedback - Jack_Henderson - 03-27-2017

Sorry, but: your guidelines mean nothing.
If your faction repeatedly acts in ways that stir controversy, you can go as much "lalalalalalala" with fingers in your ears as you want. It's not going to change a thing. Feedback threads are obligatory now and you'd do a lot better if you actually answered the complaints and took feedback seriously, instead of redirecting to your own rules that will not hold if put to the test.

__________

And what I actually wanted to say: Please answer the IMG-AUX roleplay, or I will have to assume you let the deadline pass and draw the conclusions from that.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Syf - 03-27-2017

@Jack_Henderson
Those "guidelines" are not theirs but rather official ones posted from ages past, and so far they haven't changed.
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=60886&pid=979142#pid979142


RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 03-27-2017

(03-27-2017, 08:31 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Sorry, but: your guidelines mean nothing.
If your faction repeatedly acts in ways that stir controversy, you can go as much "lalalalalalala" with fingers in your ears as you want. It's not going to change a thing. Feedback threads are obligatory now and you'd do a lot better if you actually answered the complaints and took feedback seriously, instead of redirecting to your own rules that will not hold if put to the test.

__________

And what I actually wanted to say: Please answer the IMG-AUX roleplay, or I will have to assume you let the deadline pass and draw the conclusions from that.

Those are the feedback rules. The ones in the thread should really be adhered to for the relevant feedback, as this isn't a complaint box, which is mentioned in the feedback rules.

HC is still deciding on the reply, we have people who are on opposite timezones of us, so we kinda have to linger around. It's on the to-do list.




RE: A/) - Feedback - Jack_Henderson - 03-27-2017

That post you linked is from 2011 and has clearly a lot of outdated stuff in it (that seems to be from "before tech nerf" update). But anyway: As an official faction that wants to be taken seriously, you have no choice but to listen to what people feedback you. Saying "I regard your feedback as not valid" is not going to cut it. It only makes your faction look like it was trying to avoid/deflect/ignore critizism, and makes you actually look guilty..

____

@Post: Alright, tnx for letting me know. Please try to get that post in the next few days. Stalling roleplay is not cool, and I'd like to come to a conclusion on this. Smile