(03-25-2017, 10:21 AM)Auzari Wrote: i'll reply properly later since i'm working on stuff right now but RHC-Hessen isn't in the faction or anyone i'd recognise who would be
They're not examples of your members acting out of line, they're examples where official factions acknowledged when one of their members has acted out of line and apologized for their behavior. This is something that Auxesia does not do.
Still waiting for the answers to the rest of my questions.
Posts: 6,242
Threads: 484
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles: Art Developer
(03-25-2017, 10:18 AM)TickTack Wrote: Why don't the Auxesia faction recruit the new members of the community?
If it's a case where it is an invite only faction then why doesn't the Auxesia faction send invites to new members?
Why does the Auxesia faction appear to not answer feedback in a direct manner?
Why does the Auxesia faction refuse to acknowledge when one of it's members has done something wrong and upon proof of the fact refuse to apologize. The normal standard for official factions appears to be the acknowledgement that one of their members has done something wrong at the very least and some even apologize after it.Example 1 or Example 2?
Why is it so hard to find the guidelines listed in your ID on the forums?
Also what are Auxesia's current goals aside from trying to gather technology/nom nom stuff? [Please tell me this in a few lines without linking me to a wall of text]
1. We do have new players. It's really up to them if they want to try and join, but having RP experience helps
2. Because answering in the direct manner hurts peoples feelings and "causes drama"
3. What are you even on about? The most recent ones I can remember are just either: FR5 notices, unjust warnings, or some that got reversed. The only one I remember is one person screwing up and even that situation was very hairy and borderline 'eeeh?' as finding someone on the lanes after switching is very sketchy - but he still got a massive slap for it. I don't know why you're even asking about this.
4. What guidelines? ID restrictions? No - they're not OP as some are inclined to think, and I don't /have/ to post them, there's no OORP section in our forums.
Subject to change, as it isn't 100% 'anti Nomad' - that's the Order's/Core's job. The current objective involves internal stuff, but most people are busy doing college or away for the month or two, so we wouldn't want to do anything big since we wouldn't want to have people missing out on stuff that they may be interested in.
I forgot about this because I was spending most of my day running around trying to find a lost pet, who I fortunately found, and went to sleep.
(03-27-2017, 04:51 AM)Auzari Wrote:
3. What are you even on about? The most recent ones I can remember are just either: FR5 notices, unjust warnings, or some that got reversed. The only one I remember is one person screwing up and even that situation was very hairy and borderline 'eeeh?' as finding someone on the lanes after switching is very sketchy - but he still got a massive slap for it. I don't know why you're even asking about this.
4. What guidelines? ID restrictions? No - they're not OP as some are inclined to think, and I don't /have/ to post them, there's no OORP section in our forums.
I forgot about this because I was spending most of my day running around trying to find a lost pet, who I fortunately found, and went to sleep.
On point 3 yes the event you refer to is exactly what I am referring to, I was the aggrieved party in this case and I went occ to explain to him that what he did defined metagameing and tried to come to an understanding with him without having to resort to a sanction, however he first denied it, then went on to admit it but say it wasn't metagameing then finally agreed it was metagameing but shrugged it off. All Auxesia did was ask for evidence same as the 5th who are just as accountable for this members actions, yet neither faction apologized for the actions of one of their members. I mean sure you don't have to apologize but it's good form to apologize, even in reality if a companies worker does something wrong the company will apologize to the affected party.
On point 4, I'm just asking what your current ID limitations are? Like can you claim bounties? What size transport can you use? What ships can you use etc etc...
(03-25-2017, 10:18 AM)TickTack Wrote: Also what are Auxesia's current goals aside from trying to gather technology/nom nom stuff? [Please tell me this in a few lines without linking me to a wall of text]
Do you have evidence of you running around trying to find your lost pet? I'd like to see a SS of it pls XD, Glad to hear you found it in the end though.
(03-27-2017, 05:11 AM)TickTack Wrote: On point 3 yes the event you refer to is exactly what I am referring to, I was the aggrieved party in this case and I went occ to explain to him that what he did defined metagameing and tried to come to an understanding with him without having to resort to a sanction, however he first denied it, then went on to admit it but say it wasn't metagameing then finally agreed it was metagameing but shrugged it off. All Auxesia did was ask for evidence same as the 5th who are just as accountable for this members actions, yet neither faction apologized for the actions of one of their members. I mean sure you don't have to apologize but it's good form to apologize, even in reality if a companies worker does something wrong the company will apologize to the affected party.
On point 4, I'm just asking what your current ID limitations are? Like can you claim bounties? What size transport can you use? What ships can you use etc etc...
Do you have evidence of you running around trying to find your lost pet? I'd like to see a SS of it pls XD, Glad to hear you found it in the end though.
First point: We aren't obliged to apologize for the actions of one individual that occurred months ago. I was under the impression you had spoken to him and sorted this out already, and he was already chastised for it. Please do not re-hash old issues.
Second point: Our ID is currently very limited in what we are able to do as a faction and is under rework alongside our lore for an update. We can hunt bounties and operate transports with a maximum of 3,600 cargo (the cargo change cost us two 4,300 transports which were legally registered) we can engage Nomads and Wild anywhere. Demand artifacts, cardamine and azurite anywhere, cannot use more ships larger than gunboats and can only assist factions/players if we're hired/friendly/allied to them due to the generic IFF we currently use.
Third point: Asking people for proof about what they've done in real life is inappropriate.
(03-27-2017, 05:17 AM)Vendetta Wrote: First point: We aren't obliged to apologize for the actions of one individual that occurred months ago. I was under the impression you had spoken to him and sorted this out already, and he was already chastised for it. Please do not re-hash old issues.
Second point: Our ID is currently very limited in what we are able to do as a faction and is under rework alongside our lore for an update. We can hunt bounties and operate transports with a maximum of 3,600 cargo (the cargo change cost us two 4,300 transports which were legally registered) we can engage Nomads and Wild anywhere. Demand artifacts, cardamine and azurite anywhere, cannot use more ships larger than gunboats and can only assist factions/players if we're hired/friendly/allied to them due to the generic IFF we currently use.
Third point: Asking people for proof about what they've done in real life is inappropriate.
On the first point, no it never was cleared up. Nobody even so much as tried to contact me and yes you're quiet right you're not obliged to apologize for the actions of one of your members but it makes the aggrieved party feel better when you do, wouldn't it be in your faction's interests to ensure there is as little occ hate as possible by making sure that you let players know that your faction does not stand by or support a players actions? I mean sure you say that he was chastised him for it but how was I to know, I mean you didn't even say in the sanction that you'd spoken with him about his actions.
Thanks for clearing up the ID limitations, though I still think you should have them posted somewhere so that people can read them.
Last point, Take a joke ye? I thought the "XD" would give it away as one but apparently not :O , as if I'd expect a real life screen shot of her looking for a missing pet
Guys, is it really necesary to pile gunboats into fair fights every single time?
I just logged after a 2 month break, and literally the first thing that happens is Aux logging right in the same system, magically finding me and engaging. Its getting tiring having this same situation repeat over and over and over again on my Order| ship.
~ Order|Banshee (and various others)
PS. I might aswell say this on behalf of the entire Order|, seeing the arguments raised in the chat every other day.
This Galaxy is vast; its wonders and beauty are almost unfathomable. But the galaxy also hides dark secrets, some of which have lain dormant since the beginning of time itself. There is a danger in secrets, both in seeking and in knowing. Some things are meant to be hidden from view. Some mysteries defy understanding, and sometimes even the things we think we know are untrue. Some secrets should remain untouched.
I wanted to chime in.. and say as far as feedback threads goes this reminds me of the original keeper feedback. People thought we were hunting down folks too.
Some things to keep in mind people tend to log in during the same time daily.. if you co inside with that.. you might end up having the same things happening to you. This is a small place.. its more like a rust server then an mmo. the same neighbors forces and people shooting and wrecking each others stuff.
This is going to happen folks nothing magical about it. And really. in my long LOONG smuggling career before cloaks i found places to rp and not get caught..
Ever. that was a baseline to congress smuggling outsmarting your hunters. it can be fun if you're in the right headspace.
(03-27-2017, 07:19 PM)Caelumaresh Wrote: Guys, is it really necesary to pile gunboats into fair fights every single time?
I just logged after a 2 month break, and literally the first thing that happens is Aux logging right in the same system, magically finding me and engaging. Its getting tiring having this same situation repeat over and over and over again on my Order| ship.
~ Order|Banshee (and various others)
PS. I might aswell say this on behalf of the entire Order|, seeing the arguments raised in the chat every other day.
Quote:Faction review and feedback is intended to provide a forum for raising out-of-roleplay issues concerning official factions on Discovery RP 24/7.
All discussions must be conducted in a reasonable manner. If you post while annoyed, it will most likely reflect poorly on you. This applies to all parties concerned.
3) Poor in-game behaviour, characterised by repeated incidents which are harmful to server gameplay, and not merely once-off incidents or the exercise of tactical advantage, such as outnumbering, outgunning or outthinking an opponent.
So basically if you come in three gunboats let's say and if we have alts more powerful, according to that, we can come in full force to outnumber your GB/cruiser ?
PS: I don't think it's right sometimes to change to powerful ships, because you have meta information about the presence of someone, so you are sure he has no chance and so on. This is a problem of balance now. Unless, you had an a priori contact with him and you are aware of what capabilities he had.
Rudimentary creatures of blood and flesh, you touch my mind, fumbling in ignorance, incapable of understanding. - Sovereign