Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nodwick"
(New page: == Thanks == Yes, i didnt notice my spelling mistake, thanks for making me notice it, i like the idea of the head lines, but we need to think about: How is the hierarchy going to be, be...) |
|||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Transferring Player Factions to Player Groups == | ||
| − | + | Can we transfer in the same table version, only using one table for all factions? | |
| + | Would be better to keep existing info. No problem that some factions won't be included into the table in the first place (list will be pruned alot anyway). | ||
| + | [[User:Igiss|Igiss]] 13:07, 14 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| − | + | Seems you read my mind, I'm currently working on that. I'm creating 2 tables, though, one for Factions awaiting approval and one for the rest. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 13:09, 14 May 2008 (GMT) | |
| − | + | == Kusari Politics == | |
| − | [[User: | + | Editorial changes to that page are perfectly ok by me, as long as the actual content is not changed without discussion. |
| + | |||
| + | The lousy layout is because I just jotted down my notes in vi during lunch break and then copied them. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Wrathkin|Wrathkin]] 08:27, 15 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==General Ship Stuff== | ||
| + | I suggest we put a Ship Class (or Type): [[Freighter]] in the ship Stats sections. What's your thoughts? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 10:57, 21 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Like this: | ||
| + | *Ship class: [[freighters|freigther]] | ||
| + | ? That's a nifty way to link back to the ship classes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 11:00, 21 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Exactly like that. Where would we put it? Near the top? At the top? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 11:01, 21 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I would make that the first line in the statistics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 11:15, 21 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Don't know if youve noticed, but I've started putting the ships full names in too, just like in the weapons pages. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 11:20, 21 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:20, 21 May 2008
Transferring Player Factions to Player Groups
Can we transfer in the same table version, only using one table for all factions? Would be better to keep existing info. No problem that some factions won't be included into the table in the first place (list will be pruned alot anyway).
Igiss 13:07, 14 May 2008 (GMT)
Seems you read my mind, I'm currently working on that. I'm creating 2 tables, though, one for Factions awaiting approval and one for the rest.
Nodwick 13:09, 14 May 2008 (GMT)
Kusari Politics
Editorial changes to that page are perfectly ok by me, as long as the actual content is not changed without discussion.
The lousy layout is because I just jotted down my notes in vi during lunch break and then copied them.
Wrathkin 08:27, 15 May 2008 (GMT)
General Ship Stuff
I suggest we put a Ship Class (or Type): Freighter in the ship Stats sections. What's your thoughts?
Chovynz 10:57, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
Like this:
- Ship class: freigther
? That's a nifty way to link back to the ship classes.
Nodwick 11:00, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
Exactly like that. Where would we put it? Near the top? At the top?
Chovynz 11:01, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
I would make that the first line in the statistics.
Nodwick 11:15, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
Don't know if youve noticed, but I've started putting the ships full names in too, just like in the weapons pages.
Chovynz 11:20, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
