Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nodwick"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Thanks == | == Thanks == | ||
| + | I didnt find any spelling mistake in "independant". | ||
| − | I | + | [[User:Honestic|Honestic]] 10:26 (GMT), May 9 2008 |
| + | |||
| + | I think it should be spelled 'independent' (note that there is no 'a' in the word). The online dictionary I normally use (www.dict.cc) doesn't know 'independant' neither, but it does know 'independent'. Yet, I'm no native english speaker so you could know better. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 07:29, 10 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yet i like the idea of the head lines, but we need to think about: How is the hierarchy going to be, because most of the Border Worlds are controlled either by an Outcast faction (like BLS,RoS,101st) or by Corsirs, Nomads, etc. I also thought on somthing like: Lawful/Unlawful/Neutrals, and putting the systems inside them | ||
e.g | e.g | ||
| Line 11: | Line 18: | ||
[[User:Honestic|Honestic]] 10:26 (GMT), May 9 2008 | [[User:Honestic|Honestic]] 10:26 (GMT), May 9 2008 | ||
| − | + | Thinking of it, it might be simpler to have 1 page with a table. Tables are sortable, so you could easily sort them by lawful/unlawful, Liberty/Bretonia/etc. | |
| + | |||
| + | Like this: | ||
| + | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! Name | ||
| + | ! Type | ||
| + | ! Lawful/Unlawful | ||
| + | ! Area | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | [[Liberty Rogues (player faction)|Liberty Rogues]] | ||
| + | | Player Faction | ||
| + | | Unlawful | ||
| + | | Liberty | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | [[Liberty Navy (player faction)|Liberty Navy]] | ||
| + | | Player Faction | ||
| + | | Lawful | ||
| + | | Liberty | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | [[Liberty Navy]] | ||
| + | | NPC Faction | ||
| + | | Lawful | ||
| + | | Liberty | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | [[Bretonia Police]] | ||
| + | | NPC Faction | ||
| + | | Lawful | ||
| + | | Bretonia | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could work very well, but multi-area factions might be a problem, because they won't be sorted. | ||
| − | [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 07: | + | [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 07:29, 10 May 2008 (GMT) |
Revision as of 07:29, 10 May 2008
Thanks
I didnt find any spelling mistake in "independant".
Honestic 10:26 (GMT), May 9 2008
I think it should be spelled 'independent' (note that there is no 'a' in the word). The online dictionary I normally use (www.dict.cc) doesn't know 'independant' neither, but it does know 'independent'. Yet, I'm no native english speaker so you could know better.
Nodwick 07:29, 10 May 2008 (GMT)
Yet i like the idea of the head lines, but we need to think about: How is the hierarchy going to be, because most of the Border Worlds are controlled either by an Outcast faction (like BLS,RoS,101st) or by Corsirs, Nomads, etc. I also thought on somthing like: Lawful/Unlawful/Neutrals, and putting the systems inside them e.g
Player Factions(Link) --------> Unlawful(Link) -------------> Liberty Space (Header only, with a small description) -------> Liberty Rogues (Link)
tell me what do you think about this to see how can we make it work correctly.
Honestic 10:26 (GMT), May 9 2008
Thinking of it, it might be simpler to have 1 page with a table. Tables are sortable, so you could easily sort them by lawful/unlawful, Liberty/Bretonia/etc.
Like this:
| Name | Type | Lawful/Unlawful | Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Rogues | Player Faction | Unlawful | Liberty |
| Liberty Navy | Player Faction | Lawful | Liberty |
| Liberty Navy | NPC Faction | Lawful | Liberty |
| Bretonia Police | NPC Faction | Lawful | Bretonia |
Could work very well, but multi-area factions might be a problem, because they won't be sorted.
Nodwick 07:29, 10 May 2008 (GMT)
