Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Inaccurate"

From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Leaving less serious problem for somebody else to fix.)
(Reply.)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
*It's an issue with the template, not your browser. It has never worked properly, according to the revision history, and is only in use on the [[PFID]] page. - [[User:Space|Space]] <sup>[[User talk:Space|(talk)]]</sup> 06:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 
*It's an issue with the template, not your browser. It has never worked properly, according to the revision history, and is only in use on the [[PFID]] page. - [[User:Space|Space]] <sup>[[User talk:Space|(talk)]]</sup> 06:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 
:: I fixed it to a point (now we don't get extra text), but in doing so (and displaying examples on the template page itself), the template page will now be displayed as inaccurate. If somebody else could fix that (minor) point, that'd be great. [[User:Korlus|<font color="red">'''Korlus'''</font>]] - [[User talk:Korlus|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:contributions/Korlus|<sub>(contribs)</sub>]] 03:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 
:: I fixed it to a point (now we don't get extra text), but in doing so (and displaying examples on the template page itself), the template page will now be displayed as inaccurate. If somebody else could fix that (minor) point, that'd be great. [[User:Korlus|<font color="red">'''Korlus'''</font>]] - [[User talk:Korlus|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:contributions/Korlus|<sub>(contribs)</sub>]] 03:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 +
:::Fixed it. It was also including part of the usage example upon transclusion, as the <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> tag was closed prematurely. Have a look at the changes I made to the template if you want to know one way (out of many) for avoiding that issue. - [[User:Space|Space]] <sup>[[User talk:Space|(talk)]]</sup> 07:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:54, 6 April 2013

Is it just me, or does this template show extra text that shouldn't appear? I was going to fix it, but wasn't sure if it was a local browser error, since I can't currently test on other browsers - e.g. PFID Korlus - (talk) (contribs) 09:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

  • It's an issue with the template, not your browser. It has never worked properly, according to the revision history, and is only in use on the PFID page. - Space (talk) 06:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
I fixed it to a point (now we don't get extra text), but in doing so (and displaying examples on the template page itself), the template page will now be displayed as inaccurate. If somebody else could fix that (minor) point, that'd be great. Korlus - (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Fixed it. It was also including part of the usage example upon transclusion, as the <noinclude> tag was closed prematurely. Have a look at the changes I made to the template if you want to know one way (out of many) for avoiding that issue. - Space (talk) 07:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)