Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roleplay"
From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchTumble-Weed (talk | contribs) m (comment) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::::The page should definately be linked from the Roleplay page, but I don't have the time to rework the whole thing. | ::::The page should definately be linked from the Roleplay page, but I don't have the time to rework the whole thing. | ||
::::[[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 11:33, 19 May 2008 (GMT) | ::::[[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 11:33, 19 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I will work on this article; to "formalise" it more. | ||
| + | [[User:Tumble-Weed|Tumble-Weed]]'' <sup>([[User talk: Tumble-Weed|ComLink]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Tumble-Weed|Holocron]])</sup> 00:11, 25 June 2008 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 00:11, 25 June 2008
Unacceptable Conversation
Shouldn't that go on the Out of Character page?
Nodwick 07:52, 19 May 2008 (GMT)
- Possibly. My thoughts on this location was that it is about role play. Being in and out of roleplay are closely linked so, personally I would merge the OOC page into this "overall" roleplay page.
- Chovynz 08:12, 19 May 2008 (GMT)
- Actually, I meant the Out of Role Play page, sorry for the wrong link.
- I think that the whole page needs a massive amount of work. I've only been able to see a single link in the text, but there should probably be around 50. The wording is very bad, too. Wiki content should not contain something like 'as I am writing this'. The formatting is also a very obvious point. If you add to the article, please also improve what's currently there.
- Nodwick 11:24, 19 May 2008 (GMT)
- Ah. That does make more sense. I wasn't aware of that page. Thanks.
- --Chovynz 11:28, 19 May 2008 (GMT)
- The page should definately be linked from the Roleplay page, but I don't have the time to rework the whole thing.
- Nodwick 11:33, 19 May 2008 (GMT)
I will work on this article; to "formalise" it more. Tumble-Weed (ComLink) (Holocron) 00:11, 25 June 2008 (GMT)
