Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Version"
(Created page with "=Category integration= Suggestion: Add oudated versions to the '''Category:Stubs'''. Alternatively, they should be added to an easy-to-reach thread like the To-Do page or similar...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Additionally: Currently old versions sometimes remain due to the Historical category (e.g. all currently existing 4.84 pages). Would there be a way to check if a "Historical" tag has been applied which then removes or at least puts it into a new category so it doesn't confuse with "To be updated" old versions? Maybe create a version category "v4.84 historical" or somesuch? -[[User:Senshi|Senshi]] 11:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC) | Additionally: Currently old versions sometimes remain due to the Historical category (e.g. all currently existing 4.84 pages). Would there be a way to check if a "Historical" tag has been applied which then removes or at least puts it into a new category so it doesn't confuse with "To be updated" old versions? Maybe create a version category "v4.84 historical" or somesuch? -[[User:Senshi|Senshi]] 11:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Maybe a category containing all pages marked as Outdated by this template?<br><br> | ||
| + | :I'm not sure if we can check for another template, but we can add a parameter to the version template so that it doesn't include any categories. | ||
| + | :--<span style="background-color: #F89406;padding:1px 3px 2px;-webkit-border-radius:3px;-moz-border-radius:3px;border-radius:3px;font-weight:bold;color:white;">[[User:Alex|Alex]]</span> 16:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:44, 17 January 2012
Category integration
Suggestion: Add oudated versions to the Category:Stubs. Alternatively, they should be added to an easy-to-reach thread like the To-Do page or similar. Currently one has to go to Categories and browse manually for it, or keep it bookmarked. Not really elegant, and I like being able to access them quickly to see what remains to be done. The Editing threads are a mess already, I know, but a somewhat more central placement surely would help.
Additionally: Currently old versions sometimes remain due to the Historical category (e.g. all currently existing 4.84 pages). Would there be a way to check if a "Historical" tag has been applied which then removes or at least puts it into a new category so it doesn't confuse with "To be updated" old versions? Maybe create a version category "v4.84 historical" or somesuch? -Senshi 11:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe a category containing all pages marked as Outdated by this template?
- I'm not sure if we can check for another template, but we can add a parameter to the version template so that it doesn't include any categories.
- --Alex 16:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
