Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tazuras"
From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:See [[Talk:Table:Very_Heavy_Fighters]]. If you think the placement of this table in [[VHF Combat Tips]] is "pointless" then it may be best to discuss it there. --[[User:Tazuras|Tazuras]] 10:22, 23 June 2009 (MDT) | :See [[Talk:Table:Very_Heavy_Fighters]]. If you think the placement of this table in [[VHF Combat Tips]] is "pointless" then it may be best to discuss it there. --[[User:Tazuras|Tazuras]] 10:22, 23 June 2009 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The reasons I moved the content from the seperate article is that first, transcluding pages is usually to be avoided because it makes the wiki structure unnecessarily complicated. Next, why using an arbitrary namespace, when you can use a template? Furthermore, why do you did this only for VHFs, and not for LFs, HFs and SVHFs? You can easily link to the ''Fighters'' page from the Combat Tips page. In dictionaries you won't find data (especially lists) twice either. You'll always find a "see (relatedarticle)". Be consistent. --[[User:Tsaryu|Tsaryu]]<sup>[[User talk:Tsaryu|Talk]]</sup> 00:50, 25 June 2009 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:50, 25 June 2009
I would be interested to access the Skype chat. I would need to reinstall Skype first. My ID is Canadian12345678.
Article revert Fighters resp. Table:Very Heavy Fighters
Putting aside that using custom namespaces unnecessarly transcludes and complicates a wiki structure, why would you need to put that table into another article? There's no good reason to. And even if, why are only the VHS in a seperate template? (Why should the ship specs be on two different pages? That's pointless.) --TsaryuTalk 05:51, 23 June 2009 (MDT)
- See Talk:Table:Very_Heavy_Fighters. If you think the placement of this table in VHF Combat Tips is "pointless" then it may be best to discuss it there. --Tazuras 10:22, 23 June 2009 (MDT)
- The reasons I moved the content from the seperate article is that first, transcluding pages is usually to be avoided because it makes the wiki structure unnecessarily complicated. Next, why using an arbitrary namespace, when you can use a template? Furthermore, why do you did this only for VHFs, and not for LFs, HFs and SVHFs? You can easily link to the Fighters page from the Combat Tips page. In dictionaries you won't find data (especially lists) twice either. You'll always find a "see (relatedarticle)". Be consistent. --TsaryuTalk 00:50, 25 June 2009 (MDT)
