Discovery Gaming Community

//Transmission initiated
.text file received
...decryption done
File opened//

RDA: Data Center

This channel is established as the information and message dump of all scientific and technical related activities of the Department of Research, Development and Analysis. All data, projects and reports regarding analysis and reverse engineering of foreign tech, capture and analysis of technical intel, maintenance and upgrade of LSF’s mainframe and firewall facilities among other related branches of development are to be relayed and stored upon this Data Center.

WARNING: This channel contains classified technical data, the export of which violates the Liberty Security Privacy Act (Title 12, LSF Sec. 2132). Violators will be subject to federal prosecution.

//File closed
Cyclic security checks...ok
Transmission terminated//

ENCRYPTION: High
PRIORITY:Medium
COMM ID:Captain Martin Welch
SUBJECT: Scanner research.

For the past few weeks we have been working on a new satellite like scanner to improve our data research feedback from exploring nomadic planets and foreign stellar bodies.

The "Sirius Calibrator Artificial Nano Enchanted Relays" (SCANER) provides a qualitative leap in planetary surface imaging. A proprietary technology of the Ayndroid group, this upgrade, for Department of RD&A Mobile Laboratories, sensory array delivers superior long-range topographical scanning resolution and rendering speed.

By deploying an orbital multistatic grid of 100 radar-emitting micro-satellites, the SCANER quickly delivers a global Digital Elevation Model (DEM) at 15 meters per pixel (mpp) resolution, vastly outclassing the previous scanner peak performance of 27 mpp. Such imaging quality provides superior defense intelligence, and at a speed warranted by the dangers of combat.

At slower scanning and rendering speed, the SCANER can resolve down to an astonishing 0.001 - millimeter per pixel - ideal for geological and biological prospecting, archaeological research, and long-term security surveillance. By employing such a massive multistatic grid of nearly-untraceable micro-emitters, the resilient SCANER is virtually invulnerable to electronic countermeasures. The spherical geometry of the SCANER grid also allows superior cross-sectioning of targets.

The micro-satellites interface:

[Image: tumblr_lxgwl9IhPA1qgnjgmo1_500.gif]

Welch Out...

*Signal detected*
ID: Bob Libney First Scientist of RD&A departament
Target: Prototype - 25 (Intervention)

Greetings, Bob Libney here
I should to report about Prototype-25. I won't waste time and I will tell that I close development of this prototype. There is a set of the reasons one of which is big danger of this project. With our technologies we won't be able to constrain such stream of energy.

I also will repeat about licensing for OS use for the ships of all types. To you recommend to deliver it because this OS doesn't depend on others and it can't be hacked. If you establish it, ask me on the special channel about all teams for a ship-handling.

*Signal from Mount Moffit losted*

ENCRYPTION: High
PRIORITY:Medium
COMM ID:Captain Martin Welch
SUBJECT: Science

Scientific Collaboration
The guidelines here are discussed in terms of a collaboration involving a supplier (e.g., of reagents, expertise, specialized equipment, data, methods, or computer code) (Party 1) and a receiver (Party 2). The options in each section are listed in order of increasing involvement by Party 1 in the collaboration.

Sharing of reagents and data.
-Minimal: Reagents or data will be provided that are essentially as described in published description, and Party 1 warrants that these will be prepared, stored, and shipped in a manner that will preserve their value. Party 2 will pay the costs of shipping. If the reagent is not readily available in the supplier's laboratory and there are no plans to prepare more, Party 2 may be asked to share reasonable costs of preparing the reagent for shipping.
-Option 1: Party 1 will give all available information, based on unpublished results, to help the receiver save time and use the reagents in an optimal fashion. (For example, when supplying an antibody for immunohistochemistry, the supplier will suggest a proven range of dilutions, buffers, and fixatives.)
Option 2: Both parties will describe the nature of unpublished information related to ongoing experiments in their respective laboratories, in sufficient detail that the parties can decide whether it is mutually to their benefit to share unpublished information, in whole or in part.

Design of experiments.
-Minimal: Party 1 will not be privy to details of the intended use of the reagents or data, beyond those necessary to prepare the reagents adequately.
-Option 1: Party 2 will describe the design of their experiments and invite comments from Party 1. Any suggestions that are implemented will be considered part of an active collaboration and credited appropriately.
-Option 2: Both parties will contribute actively to the design of experiments, including control experiments.

Division of labor.
- Minimal: Party 1 provides reagents/expertise/equipment/data but does not participate in the experiments of Party 2.
-Option 1: Party 1 provides training and specialized expertise to personnel of Party 2, thus facilitating the work, but does not carry out the research directly.
-Option 2: Both parties participate in experiments, but each does the subset of experiments they are most experienced, knowledgeable, or comfortable with and the other group(s) do the same with nonoverlapping subsets of experiments.
Option 3: Party 1 provides assistance with personnel and training to help with Party 2's experiments, forming an interlaboratory team that has ongoing communication during experiments and that shares the costs of doing the research.

Publication of results stemming from the collaboration.
-Minimal: Party 2 will acknowledge the source of the reagent or data in their publications, and will cite the providers' relevant publications that described the reagent and its use.
-Option 1: Party 1 will be given a copy of the manuscript prior to publication and given the option to be included in the list of authors, unless Party 1 disagrees materially with the paper, or fails to answer in a reasonable time frame.
-Option 2: Both parties participate in writing the paper, and the resulting publication spells out the contributions of each.

Co-authorship order.
-Minimal: Party 2 will write the paper and choose the order of authorship that Party 2 feels is fair and appropriate.
-Option 1: At the time that a decision is made to offer co-authorship to Party 1, Party 2 will discuss the planned order of authors and the rationale with Party 1.
-Option 2: As the experiments are being designed and planned, both parties will be apprised of the relative roles of individuals in both laboratories, and a tentative co-author list will be discussed. Any changes will be discussed in advance of writing the paper.

Access to unpublished data arising from the collaboration.
- Minimal: Party 1 has no right to access to any data obtained by Party 2.
- Option 1: Party 2 will give basic feedback on how the material supplied by Party 1 was used.
- Option 2: Party 2 shares the specific results obtained with Party 1, with the understanding that such information is confidential and cannot be used by Party 1 without the written consent of Party 2.
- Option 3: Party 1 has access to data originally intended for publication under joint authorship, whether or not the data are actually published. The unpublished data can be used by Party 1 in their grant submissions and for their own knowledge.
- Option 4: Both parties will discuss the types of experiments that are being conducted in the general area of the collaboration, and will discuss which activities (beyond the joint experiments) should be shared knowledge.

Intellectual property issues. Negotiations of intellectual property issues fall beyond the scope of the present guidelines. However, potential collaborators should at least acknowledge the types of intellectual property issues that may arise in the course of the collaboration.
- Minimal: Party 2 does not share in any intellectual property related to the existing reagent or data.
- Optional: If the joint experiments or data analyses result in new information or uses having commercial value, both parties will negotiate shared intellectual property.
Welch out..

ENCRYPTION: High
PRIORITY:Medium
COMM ID: Marcus Gellert

Project: Anchorage

As you know we various control panels, buttons to control everything in Sirius: from Warships to your own NeuralNet programs. But technology never stops to give us new ways to control,learn, see, even smell Universe.

Most intresting example is Holo-tainment Bands. Devices that allows you to create direct connection to your neural system,allows you to smell,taste,see things like if they exists in reality. Imagine that we can create two-way connection between your brain and your fighter: you're not order it to fly, you're flying it as part of yourself. Your own metal body,isn't it fascinating?
Imagine how it'll change our way of life.....Maybe we can even create our own "grid" where we can send each other text messages,or orders without even saying a word. This will change Fleet-Coordinations a lot!

No need to know where all those buttons and consoles are located. No need to press button to shoot.

Indeed there is huge amount of work that needs to be done,but I belive we can do it.

If High Command is interested I'm ready to give detailed plan about project.

Have a nice day!

ENCRYPTION: High
PRIORITY:Medium
COMM ID:Captain Martin Welch
TARGET ID: Marcus Gellert

Mankind in its search for explanations of the phenomena that affect our lives has, with the obvious exception of modern medicine, failed to confront the fact that the body IS a machine. It is necessary to comprehend the implications of the mechanical nature of the body in order to understand the interrelation of the various components that make up human life, particularly the implications that involve the five senses and the way we perceive vibrations through them. I like the sound of what you're saying to me Mr. Gellert, the thing is that reaching this goal is near to impossible. Putting the human body (the human machine) in to a computer will probably make it obsolete this way.

You see, the human body is a machine consisting of many different, interconnected machines. Each machine (heart, lungs, intestines, etc.) runs at its own individual speed, but all function in a specific, predetermined relationship to each other. In this sense, the body is analogous to the most complicated man-made machines, such as fighter vessels or space capsules, which consist of many separately functioning components that are mechanically linked together, each of which, in itself, is a complete machine. In fact, the body is the most complex of all such compound machines. But unlike man-made machines, the various machines that make up the body are not in a rigid, inflexible, unchanging interrelation to each other. The flywheels and cogwheels of a watch or the parts of a transmission system of a space craft are in rigid interrelationship to each other. They either function at a prescribed ratio to each other, with little allowable tolerance, or they break. Not so the human body. Even with relatively great aberrations from what would be considered normal, it is still possible for the body to function and sustain meaningful life. If the components of the body greatly exceed the normal tolerances, the aberrations become so disruptive that they are usually experienced as sickness. But there is relatively great leeway in the ratio to each other of the functioning of the various interrelated separate organs. While these possible variations do affect the functioning of our bodies, determine our general feeling of well-being (nervousness, sluggishness, etc.), and limit (in the sense of defining the limits of) our sensory perceptions, they must vary quite far from the norm before someone would be either incapacitated or considered sick. But it is the subtle ways in which bodies that are functioning normally differ from each other, and the effect these differences have on the way we experience our five senses, that determine the differing qualities of our experiences. The human body can not accelerate to its maximum potential if you put it in a machine. Which is why such a feet is I believe to be impossible, or at least not possible with the current technology we have.

But, as I said before, I do like the idea which is why I'm going to fund your research with some resources, which should be enough for a light study program on that matter.

Make me proud, Doctor.
Welch out...

ENCRYPTION: High
PRIORITY:Medium
To: Mr. Welch
From: Markus Gellert

Quote:You see, the human body is a machine consisting of many different, interconnected machines

Admit that fact that we don't even know who we are. We have different social roles in this......mathematical world. IS man a machine or not? Answer is yes.

Will this machine work as robot, if robot is " have very very very developed internal connections and big amount of it's subsystem" ? Indefinable.

Will function of that machine have correlation with initial conditions? Yes.

Will this machine state that another machine is wrong? Probably.

Why? Because it "thinks so".

You forgot that BNI applications have their own way to "display" information.

Will this machine give me definition of "two-way connection"?

Depends on initial condition, function, probability.

But If i ask one thousand machines, their answers will become more "predictable" .

Basically let's state that "two way" is function from some parameters

Like : TW = f(a,b,c......z)

What are those a's,b's,c's and so on?

Interesting question,isn't it?

a,b,c are actually functions too

Just a "lil' hint".

As for now:

10 crates with bio-neural processors
15 crates with BIN helmets
25 crates with optronics
two dozen rats
and coffee.....or tea crates

ENCRYPTION: High
PRIORITY:Medium
COMM ID:Captain Martin Welch
TARGET ID: Marcus Gellert

Our bodies contain several separate but co-operating information processing systems – the nervous (including the brain), immune, muscular, metabolic and skeletal systems, plus the DNA itself – which form a complex heterogeneous network, talking to each other via nerves, hormones and other chemical signals. If you can create a full connection between the human "network" and that of a synthetic "interface", it would be one of the greatest achievements in the resent history of our civilization. But do keep in mind a few factors...This experiment may require you to expose your test subjects (and perhaps yourself) excessively to computer radiation, which may lead to many health concerns. So make sure the environment, in which you're going to hold your tests is equipped with anti-radiation filtering system. The second thing I'd like to add is that all experiments are to be held according to the safety regulations of the Department Of Research Development and Analysis...please do not get yourself or anyone else radiated, physically injured or decapitated.

I have informed the staff on Willard Research Station in California about your future project. The resources, you have requested, will be at your disposal once you have passed the proper security and background checks and provided the required certifications to the attending officer there. Speaking of which, in order to conduct the proper research and achieve the maximum out of the experiment, it will be better if you work without any of the restrictions that may hold you back. Which is why I am giving you a Level II Security Clearance: this level of clearance will grant you the right to access designated and classified information up to the High Tech classified level on a need-to-know basis. Department Heads have the discretion to allow for an individual to access Top Secret-level information without higher-level clearance on a case-to-case basis. The code for the clearance is Sigma Chi Iota Epsilon Nu Chi Eta. This code will be erased and replaced by a new one immediately after you have used it so try and make the most out of it

I believe this should be more than sufficient to get some valid and satisfying results.

Welch out...

ENCRYPTION: High
PRIORITY:Medium
COMM ID:Charles Manson
Subject:
Cyber Attacks & Advanced Persistent Threats:
Four-Step Process for Countering Advanced Attackers

No matter the size of our organization, advanced cyber-attacks, such as Advanced Persistent Threats, represent a credible threat and risk to our organization. Whether a cybercriminal, disgruntled activist, or nation-state actor, Chief Security Officers, as well as all members of the RD&A department, must address the risk these adversaries pose to our organization.
My Information security research and analysis team aka "Securosis" (recently upgraded to a Counter Threat Unit by Mister Welch) has designed a four-step process for detecting and battling advanced cyber attacks.
-Gather intelligence
-Mine for cyber threat indicators
-Respond to information security alerts
-Break the “kill chain” or cyber-attack process

We have global threat intelligence from our Counter Threat Unit (CTU) about emerging cyber threats against our organization; Threat hunting specialists mine deep within the environment for threat indicators; And we're currently working on upgrading our Active Incident Responders (AIR), which contain the advanced threat and break the kill chain.

Manson out..

COMM ID: Professor Terry Doe, Ph.D
TARGET ID: The Directorate
SUBJECT: Project Completion and Approval
ENCRYPTION: High

Hello,

I would like give an update on the Predator Drone project. The increased funding has been an extreme help in the continuation and now, completion of the project. When I was first asked to head the project I at first didn't believe it as most RDA projects stay away from AI-based structures however after accepting, the amount of data we had on new gen AI structures was amazing and...well, right, I won't get off track.

The prototypes had already been completed and have been stress tested under realistic conditions for the past several months, we have completed the newest model blueprints and I myself have confirmed their operational green light, the RSR-C Predator III and RSR-G Predator IV variants are clear and ready to use, we'll be getting rid of most of the prototypes within the next few hours. The technical specifics and change-log has been attached to this communique. As for my professional opinion, the G series would be much more useful in regards of internal House security due to it's superior information gathering capability as well as cloak technology. While it doesn't have any offensive capabilities I'm sure that our own agents as well as the Liberty Armed Forces will take care of any problem once the problem has been found and identified. What further proves my point is that the C series, while equipped with an impressive gun, turret and ballistic loadout, is somewhat inefficient in comparison to human pilots due to the drone's frame, the Spatial wasn't designed for advanced combat and this disadvantage translates into the Predator frame.

But nonetheless, both variants have been cleared for duty and the blueprints have already been sent to Grise Fjord beforehand.

Good day, Terry Doe signing off.

Liberty Security Force

The.Rolling.Stoned

Decktare

The.Rolling.Stoned

Xenord

The.Rolling.Stoned

Xenord

The.Rolling.Stoned

Carn_EVIL

Liberty Security Force