Pytho - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +---- Forum: Discovery Mod Balance (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=31) +---- Thread: Pytho (/showthread.php?tid=24460) |
Pytho - swift - 08-06-2009 The turn speed of the Sabre is better, and the powerplant I am not sure, but I believe a bit smaller. Anyways I don't give a damn. Pytho - Andrew_Bonesovich - 08-06-2009 ' Wrote:The turn speed of the Sabre is better, and the powerplant I am not sure, but I believe a bit smaller. Didnt you mean Falcata? Pytho has bigger powerplant I think. Its a heavy bomber, Falcata is light bomber. However, the Falcata has more armor than Pytho, while its supposed to be "light". The Pytho is now a heavy bomber with light bomber armor. And no, I dont think it everything should be 100% balanced, but when something is supposed to be -heavy- it should be really -heavy- All heavy bombers I know have 20 000+ armor. Why the Pytho has less than a light bomber? Pytho - swift - 08-06-2009 Well the turn rate of the Sabre is also better than the Pytho. xD Sorry, lapsus linguae. Pytho - reavengitair - 08-06-2009 Well, I've always thought about joining an IMG... making an indy or joining IMG/CR. The ships are really quite good, and they're RP is excellent. But anyway. They are independant MINERS arn't they? Should they really have the best bomber ever? Pytho - Andrew_Bonesovich - 08-06-2009 ' Wrote:Well, I've always thought about joining an IMG... making an indy or joining IMG/CR. The ships are really quite good, and they're RP is excellent. CR is using them too, and they are not miners. They shouldnt have the best bomber ever, but surely not the worst. Pytho - reavengitair - 08-06-2009 Quote:CR is using them too, and they are not miners. But, prove me wrong if you want, im not familliar with the IMG/CR, arn't the IMG the primary users of the bombers? And I don't think its the worst bomber. Im definatley sure there are far worse bombers than that thing. Also, that bomber is quite good looking... in my opinion. Pytho - tansytansey - 08-06-2009 ' Wrote:Pytho has bigger powerplant I think. Its a heavy bomber, Falcata is light bomber.Please, for the love of God people check your facts. The Pytho and Falcata both have a light bomber powerplant. 38k. The exact same power plant. They are both Light Bombers, and believe it or not many Light Bombers are actually bigger than their heavy counter-parts, it's a part of their balance. Pytho - finaldragons - 08-06-2009 ' Wrote:i'd be happily gunned down to a falcata knowing my ship looked better before it blew up:) fully agree! Pytho - Armageddon - 08-06-2009 IMG and CR split into two groups over a dispute. The CR was originally the guard for IMG shipping in the tau sectors (If this is wrong forgive me.) So we actually use the combat vessels a hell of a lot. A lot more than the civilian models available to the IMG. Let me tell you why i like the pytho. The SNAC and razor slots are on the main hull meaning they fire from the center that makes it easier to aim. So from the use of the Razor and the SNAC point of view it is a very good bomber. Where it tends to fall down slightly is in its evasive capabilities. But that can be solved by getting better at flying your ship. I am happy that the IMG/CR just has a bomber now as i remember when the CR used to struggle against the Battleships with only the viper II. This is why i dont complain as having a underpowered bomber according to some people in this thread, is better than having none at all. I actually like it as it makes it a rather specialised ship. Meaning that we need both Nyx and Pythos to operate effectively. Pytho - n1kodemus - 08-06-2009 ' Wrote:(lol "nudge force" im looking at that before i by anything next time) I was just too lazy to separate the useless information from the rest.:lol: |