Discovery Gaming Community
XP| The Xeno Predators - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+--- Thread: XP| The Xeno Predators (/showthread.php?tid=120121)

Pages: 1 2 3


DELETE - Scotia - 09-05-2014

DELETE


RE: XP| The Xeno Predators - nOmnomnOm - 09-05-2014

(09-04-2014, 08:01 PM)|nfrared Wrote:
(09-04-2014, 07:21 PM)KaiserDietz Wrote: //Feedback here? Otherwise mods pls nuke.

Anyways, this is a pretty hackneyed question, but how does this faction differentiate from XA|?

Feedback here is fine. It probably doesn't differ all that much from the XA goals. The emphasis on this group is to stop exports. This idea is the product of this thread. It's time Junkers got a shakedown.

So your making a new faction JUST because you think XA is not doing it well and to target junkers. While targeting them is part of RP the way you said that totally makes me think your intentions of making this factions are just to counter another faction and nothing else? Do you plan on more continuation and RP or is this simply a kill and hunt junkers faction?


RE: XP| The Xeno Predators - Evo - 09-05-2014

It's good to see another Xeno faction popping up, but what exactly does it add? The lore really isn't anything special or different. Same goals, same ships, same actions. Granted we've had a lot of indy Xeno groups pop up over the years, but they usually hold something different that justifies making a new faction other than wanting to lead something themselves.

Another question I hold: Will you be respecting XA's choices in friends? Meaning will you be shooting up USI or causing problems for them, showing hostility towards the odd Corsair smuggling in Liberty, ruffling feathers with Ames zoners, etc.


RE: XP| The Xeno Predators - |nfrared - 09-06-2014

(09-05-2014, 12:48 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote:
(09-04-2014, 08:01 PM)|nfrared Wrote:
(09-04-2014, 07:21 PM)KaiserDietz Wrote: //Feedback here? Otherwise mods pls nuke.

Anyways, this is a pretty hackneyed question, but how does this faction differentiate from XA|?

Feedback here is fine. It probably doesn't differ all that much from the XA goals. The emphasis on this group is to stop exports. This idea is the product of this thread. It's time Junkers got a shakedown.

So your making a new faction JUST because you think XA is not doing it well and to target junkers. While targeting them is part of RP the way you said that totally makes me think your intentions of making this factions are just to counter another faction and nothing else? Do you plan on more continuation and RP or is this simply a kill and hunt junkers faction?

I never said that XA are "not doing it well". And I'll say it one last time, this has nothing to do with jealousy or a Junker-Hate thing. This is no new conspiracy against Junkers, Xenos have always gone after them. I have never once said in this thread that I am only targeting Junkers, only that they make a valid target.

(09-05-2014, 08:52 PM)Evo Wrote: It's good to see another Xeno faction popping up, but what exactly does it add? The lore really isn't anything special or different. Same goals, same ships, same actions. Granted we've had a lot of indy Xeno groups pop up over the years, but they usually hold something different that justifies making a new faction other than wanting to lead something themselves.

Another question I hold: Will you be respecting XA's choices in friends? Meaning will you be shooting up USI or causing problems for them, showing hostility towards the odd Corsair smuggling in Liberty, ruffling feathers with Ames zoners, etc.

My next move was actually post a communications post to hash out these sort of diplomatic details. We might be new on the scene but we know we have to show the proper respects. You can expect nothing less than total cooperation from us.
Who knows, we may become part of the Xeno Alliance one day.


RE: XP| The Xeno Predators - Luke. - 09-06-2014

(09-06-2014, 03:30 AM)|nfrared Wrote: Who knows, we may become part of the Xeno Alliance one day.

That would defeat the point of your faction existing altogether, don't you think?


RE: XP| The Xeno Predators - Evo - 09-06-2014

(09-06-2014, 03:45 PM)Luke. Wrote:
(09-06-2014, 03:30 AM)|nfrared Wrote: Who knows, we may become part of the Xeno Alliance one day.

That would defeat the point of your faction existing altogether, don't you think?

The point of his faction is the same point of our faction; a merge would not nullify what it wishes to achieve. If anything, it would improve it. XA holds more resources than most if not all of the xeno groups due to our deals and the upcoming planetary mining.

Anyways, good to hear. That was my only concern, really.


RE: XP| The Xeno Predators - |nfrared - 09-06-2014

(09-06-2014, 04:11 PM)Evo Wrote:
(09-06-2014, 03:45 PM)Luke. Wrote:
(09-06-2014, 03:30 AM)|nfrared Wrote: Who knows, we may become part of the Xeno Alliance one day.

That would defeat the point of your faction existing altogether, don't you think?

The point of his faction is the same point of our faction; a merge would not nullify what it wishes to achieve. If anything, it would improve it. XA holds more resources than most if not all of the xeno groups due to our deals and the upcoming planetary mining.

Anyways, good to hear. That was my only concern, really.

I have RPed a similar situation before. Sometimes these groups don't realise their differences or similarities until they have had some time to interact with each other. Until we see some XA- / XP| action, we may not realise that we do have some differences, or that we were made to work together. I wouldn't see a merge into XA- as a waste of time, in fact I would see that as an honor or acheivement to strive towards. Maybe becoming a subgroup that specialises in one or two main goals for the Xenos as a whole.

For now we would like to be seen as a potential asset to the XA-, one that can be drawn upon by them if required.