+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Community Feedback (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=627)
+--- Thread: Staff Feedback Thread (/showthread.php?tid=168272)
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Kalhmera - 07-25-2023
I mean I have to agree with Nyx. Its been a thing for so long there really shouldn't be a need for an announcement for it.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - SnakThree - 07-25-2023
(07-25-2023, 04:10 AM)Kauket Wrote: Because it counts as exploiting, and Disco has sanctioned people as far back as 2013 for cheating and exploits? You don't need to list every exploit to tell what is or what is not intended game function that gives great advantageThen don't list any exploits to begin with. You should not have it half and half, where part of the rules are written and another part unwritten, passed on from mouth to mouth or found out via trial and error.
Effort it takes to add clear exploit onto the rules: minimal.
Time it takes to add clear exploit onto the rules: minimal.
Impact of adding clear written rule instead of whatever was this: immeasurable
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Kauket - 07-25-2023
(07-25-2023, 04:18 AM)Kalhmera Wrote: I mean I have to agree with Nyx. Its been a thing for so long there really shouldn't be a need for an announcement for it.
Newer players weren't aware of it, though the circumstances around the announcement and the player sanctioning was kinda backwards iirc, where one thing should have been the announcement and the other a sanction.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Kalhmera - 07-25-2023
Yeah it was a bit odd for that sanction to have been put out but im having a hard time grasping that we have had such an influx of newer players that they just didnt know. But I guess its a good thing at the same time? Not sure.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Czechmate - 07-25-2023
Just a technical oversight that will be corrected I'm sure - just announce it, simples.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Saronsen - 07-29-2023
i think it goes without saying you should provide some sort of evidence if youre going to FR5 factions and they ask for said evidence.
otherwise just put it in the rephack change in the config and announce it for next restart
still waiting for the evidence i requested that made it possible so you could rephack my entire faction hostile to zoners
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Morigan - 07-29-2023
Thanks for all !
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Sally - 08-02-2023
Violation Report Guidelines Wrote:2. Do I really have enough evidence to make this stick?
Sanctions won’t go through unless sufficient evidence is provided of the report. You were there for the entire incident, yep, but the administration was not. All we have to go by is what you give us. Is that enough?
What exactly is considered by the staff as "enough evidence" for a valid ingame violation report?
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Karst - 08-02-2023
Depends on what you're reporting.
If it's, for example, a no rp engagement, you're probably going to need a video of the whole encounter, since it will be very difficult to prove otherwise that it was the other party that initiated the engagement.
If it's someone oorp flaming, or using the wrong ID, you don't even really need a screenshot since we can easily check these things on our end.
RE: Admin Feedback Thread - Fab - 08-02-2023
(08-02-2023, 03:23 AM)Sally Wrote: What exactly is considered by the staff as "enough evidence" for a valid ingame violation report?
(08-02-2023, 08:02 AM)Karst Wrote: If it's, for example, a no rp engagement, you're probably going to need a video of the whole encounter, since it will be very difficult to prove otherwise that it was the other party that initiated the engagement.
a long while ago I sent a VR about engagement without prior roleplay where I was flying a scanner drone and someone starts shooting as soon as they see me
it is literally impossible for me to start the engagement
dude wasn't warned or sanctioned to this day, which really blurs the definition of "enough evidence"