+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: News and Announcements (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Thread: Rule Revision - February 2024 (/showthread.php?tid=201704)
Rule Revision - February 2024 - Karst - 02-08-2024
Hello, players.
Like we mentioned a while back, we've wanted to simplify the rules so they aren't such a massive block of text to slam onto new players, and aren't a complicated maze to navigate for old ones.
We've implemented a much, much simpler version, which should be more or less the same in spirit, but should do away with a lot of unnecessary technicality.
Please tell us if there's typos, errors, or weird stuff going on in the revised set.
Thanks!
The Server Rules
RE: Rule Revision - February 2024 - TheSauron - 02-08-2024
Quote:3.1 - You may only attack a Core 1 base (or higher) if your ID has a ZOI covering it. You may only attack a Core 2 base (or higher) with additional roleplay documented on the forum.
Does this mean IDs with no ZoI are unable to siege bases?
RE: Rule Revision - February 2024 - Kauket - 02-08-2024
finally i can write erotic content with intensive swearing on the forums and get away with it
RE: Rule Revision - February 2024 - Toaster - 02-08-2024
(02-08-2024, 05:54 PM)Kauket Wrote: finally i can write erotic content with intensive swearing on the forums and get away with it
Let's get started.
The rules no longer clarify what counts as equipment for IDs that can demand or attack ships carrying certain kinds of it.
RE: Rule Revision - February 2024 - Couden - 02-08-2024
(02-08-2024, 05:54 PM)TheSauron Wrote: Does this mean IDs with no ZoI are unable to siege bases?
no zoi = sirius wide, no?
RE: Rule Revision - February 2024 - Karst - 02-08-2024
(02-08-2024, 05:54 PM)TheSauron Wrote:Quote:3.1 - You may only attack a Core 1 base (or higher) if your ID has a ZOI covering it. You may only attack a Core 2 base (or higher) with additional roleplay documented on the forum.
Does this mean IDs with no ZoI are unable to siege bases?
POB sieges follow one rule above all, which is "Does it make sense for your individual or organization to attack this base" and if it does, you're good.
RE: Rule Revision - February 2024 - Lea Kaufman - 02-08-2024
It would be neat what is considered Omegas and Sigmas tho
Quote:System Classifications:
4.0 - For ZOI rules, systems are classified as:
Liberty
House Space: New York*, Alaska, California, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Texas.
Bretonia
House Space: New London*, Cambridge, Leeds, Manchester, Newcastle
Rheinland
House Space: New Berlin*, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Stuttgart, Thuringia.
Kusari
House Space: New Tokyo*, Hokkaido, Honshu, Kyushu, Shikoku.
Gallia
House Space: Ile-de-France*, Burgundy, Champagne, Languedoc, Orleanais, Picardy.
*House Capital
Independent Worlds
Bering, Chugoku, Cologne, Copernicus, Cortez, Coronado, Dublin, Galileo, Hudson, Inverness, Kansas, Kepler, Magellan, Ontario, Provence, Tohoku, Unknown, Vespucci, Zurich.
RE: Rule Revision - February 2024 - Haste - 02-08-2024
(02-08-2024, 05:57 PM)Toaster Wrote: The rules no longer clarify what counts as equipment for IDs that can demand or attack ships carrying certain kinds of it.
I'd say Nomad guns count as Nomad Materials.
RE: Rule Revision - February 2024 - Traxit - 02-08-2024
A step forward.
RE: Rule Revision - February 2024 - TheSauron - 02-08-2024
(02-08-2024, 06:00 PM)Karst Wrote:(02-08-2024, 05:54 PM)TheSauron Wrote:Quote:3.1 - You may only attack a Core 1 base (or higher) if your ID has a ZOI covering it. You may only attack a Core 2 base (or higher) with additional roleplay documented on the forum.
Does this mean IDs with no ZoI are unable to siege bases?
POB sieges follow one rule above all, which is "Does it make sense for your individual or organization to attack this base" and if it does, you're good.
Right, I forgot we're in the unwritten principles supersede the written ruleset era. It's just begging for people to get tripped up on unnecessary ambiguity.