Difference between revisions of "Talk:New York"
From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | What are we going to do about normal Systems? The infocard is only | + | What are we going to do about normal Systems? The infocard is only simple:<br> |
It doesnt take in account all the discovery additions. | It doesnt take in account all the discovery additions. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | [[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 08:22, 22 May 2008 (GMT) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
I think this would be quite ok, but it should be updated to reflect Discovery changes. And I think we should also note what can be mined in the system (wouldn't be very spectacular in New York, but it might be interesting for Colorado, for example). | I think this would be quite ok, but it should be updated to reflect Discovery changes. And I think we should also note what can be mined in the system (wouldn't be very spectacular in New York, but it might be interesting for Colorado, for example). | ||
Revision as of 08:22, 22 May 2008
What are we going to do about normal Systems? The infocard is only simple:
It doesnt take in account all the discovery additions.
Chovynz 08:22, 22 May 2008 (GMT)
I think this would be quite ok, but it should be updated to reflect Discovery changes. And I think we should also note what can be mined in the system (wouldn't be very spectacular in New York, but it might be interesting for Colorado, for example).
When we update this info, we could offer the updated content to the Admins to add it in the next version, that would improve Discovery, I think.
Nodwick 07:10, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
