Difference between revisions of "Talk:New York"
Tumble-Weed (talk | contribs) m (Question asked) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Is the word "System" in the title meant to capitalised? | Is the word "System" in the title meant to capitalised? | ||
[[User:Tumble-Weed|Tumble-Weed]]'' <sup>([[User talk: Tumble-Weed|ComLink]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Tumble-Weed|Holocron]])</sup> 11:01, 4 June 2008 (GMT) | [[User:Tumble-Weed|Tumble-Weed]]'' <sup>([[User talk: Tumble-Weed|ComLink]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Tumble-Weed|Holocron]])</sup> 11:01, 4 June 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Okay, about "criminals". Junkers are more of a neutral party, is it fair to them to lump them in with Outcasts and Rogues? it might set a bad model to follow for newbies if they think "Oh, hey, the Wiki said they're unlawfuls, so PEW PEW PEW I r TeH uBeR pWnZ0r Junker killah!" | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Boss|Boss]] 16:22, 5 June 2008 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 16:22, 5 June 2008
What are we going to do about normal Systems? The infocard is only simple:
It doesnt take in account all the discovery additions.
Chovynz 08:22, 22 May 2008 (GMT)
I think this would be quite ok, but it should be updated to reflect Discovery changes. And I think we should also note what can be mined in the system (wouldn't be very spectacular in New York, but it might be interesting for Colorado, for example).
When we update this info, we could offer the updated content to the Admins to add it in the next version, that would improve Discovery, I think.
Nodwick 07:10, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
Is the word "System" in the title meant to capitalised? Tumble-Weed (ComLink) (Holocron) 11:01, 4 June 2008 (GMT)
Okay, about "criminals". Junkers are more of a neutral party, is it fair to them to lump them in with Outcasts and Rogues? it might set a bad model to follow for newbies if they think "Oh, hey, the Wiki said they're unlawfuls, so PEW PEW PEW I r TeH uBeR pWnZ0r Junker killah!"
Boss 16:22, 5 June 2008 (GMT)
