@Felipe please do, I really hope it will be fixed soon.
@Shaggy thanks for a workaround, it's useful in short term but I will still wait until devs change the stuff and make all freelancers who had no conflicts with Crayter actually neutral or something to them. However, I might need to do this for my trader ship in the near future...
(02-28-2017, 01:45 AM)HanCloudstone Wrote: @Felipe please do, I really hope it will be fixed soon.
@Shaggy thanks for a workaround, it's useful in short term but I will still wait until devs change the stuff and make all freelancers who had no conflicts with Crayter actually neutral or something to them. However, I might need to do this for my trader ship in the near future...
They are aware of the problem or should be aware, as when I was leading CR| I informed them of the problem when a new reputation sheet was request.
(02-28-2017, 01:45 AM)HanCloudstone Wrote: @Felipe please do, I really hope it will be fixed soon.
@Shaggy thanks for a workaround, it's useful in short term but I will still wait until devs change the stuff and make all freelancers who had no conflicts with Crayter actually neutral or something to them. However, I might need to do this for my trader ship in the near future...
They are aware of the problem or should be aware, as when I was leading CR| I informed them of the problem when a new reputation sheet was request.
Yay Shaggs, i know you have taken lot of work and sweat about it, well just bump to see if something moves on that direction
Assuming this is the feedback for =CR=, if so, the first post needs an update.
Maybe you shouldn't be using "I wont kill u so?" as an excuse to ignore the rules of Connecticut and engage without asking. Evidence can be sent upon request.
FYI, I'm not salty, I'm [*USI*]Salt.Lake[L-E], get it right
Well, it seems i somehow managed to annoy you. I was merely testing my bombs and i checked if u had stuff to lose )) Lets not fret over such a minör thing hm? Nevertheless i apologize
@Eurobeat thank you for bringing this to our attention, I am glad you did not file a report considering this sounds like a violation of the Connecticut rules which have recently been implemented.
I will not just inform the player who done it who has appeared to have apologized already but will leave a nice little reminded to all of =CR= players and members.
Greetings people! Shooter here, first of all i want to thank all who supported me in my lovely adventure of CR, and im very happy to be in the leading position of it. So first of all, please from now on dont "pollute" this thread with after-fight gank complaints. Ganking is heavily frowned upon in our faction, However, in the heat of battle mistakes happens, as long as it isnt extreme cases like blatantly throwing a whole fleet of caps into mere snubs, i would like to deal with such complaints over my Skype, case-by case basis. I believe handling such situations "live" is more effective.
Secondly, i see this recent "event" of leadership change as a White new page in the Crayter saga, so whatever grudges may happened before, i apologize in behalf of whole CR if we had errors and would like to start with those parties from "zero".
He means he'd rather talk about the issue in a voice call or such over skype, teamspeak, discord etc, instead of leaving messages here where they might be missed or blown out of proportion.