(09-21-2013, 04:55 PM)Durandal Wrote: point out the faults with the original post
I think this has happened here:
(09-21-2013, 07:55 AM)Ndk071 Wrote: You want to be friendly and HELP house Lawful's, You want to engage the Coalition Friendly Red Hessians and you are misusing the Coalition ID in every way imaginable with this.
[...]
You want to:
1.) Be Friendly With the Houses and help house Lawfuls. If you want to do this, Do NOT use the Coalition ID, as it is completely the wrong ID to be all friendly happy with the Houses, Sorry.
2.) You want to be Neutral with the Coalition but use the Coalition ID? I think this one is obvious, yes?
Overall
I do not believe this faction is well thought out or will be a success, i can almost guarantee you this. I would suggest for you to re-think your faction as a whole, and look to other ID's than the Coalition ID, because the way you are intending to use it is going in the exact opposite direction of the Coalition.
That it has been done by an indie is irrelevant, in my book it is just natural you don't repeat other's words when you agree with them, only state that you agree with them.
Besides, with the "threats", official faction members assured the original poster that they do not wish to force Coalition roleplay on themselves, yet they need to be aware of the possible inRP consequences in case they wish to continue with this kind of RP. As it would only be logical from the SCRA to inRP consider those aiding their enemies and hunting their allies as enemies and thieves if they do that with Coalition tech.