(04-22-2015, 01:59 PM)Unlucky_Soul Wrote: IMO not worth the hassle.
IMO buffing/nerfing GBs in every patch is worse. We simply should give an option to separate caps and snubs in battles, until both finds it funny. GBs can follow snubs any time, but at the cost of leaving big clumsy caps uncovered. They will look really stupid.
(04-22-2015, 01:59 PM)Unlucky_Soul Wrote: If you can make more elaborations on the other balance issues.
Yes, I was thinking about giving bombers and light fighters more thrust speed But, it's NOT subject to this thread.
(04-22-2015, 01:59 PM)Unlucky_Soul Wrote: BTW where would battle Cruisers fit in ? perhaps 70?
I honestly have no idea how all would work. But devs could get interested eventually and test this model - one day. I'm sure they were thinking about no-thrusters solution, but didn't waste efforts to mention it. Battlecruisers should fly at 80 too imho, but compensate with size and less turning/acceleration. I saw many players never TS/Z with BCRs, btw.
(04-22-2015, 02:09 PM)evanz Wrote: everyone knows that snubs will wreck a GB, with or without thrusters
Check HERE, seems like devs are planning to nerf both GBs and their turrets, mate. I think my proposition offers GBs a chance to keep their agility and weaponry as they currently are. I'm trying to move GBs from chasing to covering role and keep their other stats.