(06-09-2016, 02:38 AM)Drrobe Wrote: The idea was just to use common sense.
I took my time several times in the past to point out how such thing exists in theory only and not in practice. I won't bother this time, I'll just let you find out yourselves that we are not in a fairy tale or utopia.
(06-09-2016, 06:51 AM)sindroms Wrote:
(06-09-2016, 06:45 AM)Tunicle Wrote:
(06-09-2016, 06:27 AM)sindroms Wrote: 4.2 Piracy demands must be kept within reason and abide fairplay between players.
That probably encapuslates what we were after.
Then please remove the specific about there being ONE demand. If there are two consequetive demands that are used in order to coax a trader to decline the demand and be killed, it falls under said rule above and 1.2 . Remove the ''one demand'' part and there should be no more problems the rule catching demands that are a RP consequence rather than a piracy demand.
Yes, please.
EDIT:
(06-09-2016, 08:25 AM)Drrobe Wrote: With this new system, it's cut and dry. Think of a speed limits. You're in a city - you can only go 30 here, but here you can go 45, but only one way. That's the old rules. New rules are "here is the speed limit. 60." Go over that, you get a ticket. Under than you're fine." This is making one rule, that of course have expectations, but we won't slap for those nuances. We'll slap for outright breaking that one rule, and it will be public and if someone fights it, it'll be public and allow for everyone to see it.
Right now it looks more like "The speed limit is much bigger than what it was before." and the clarification thread is a barchoba to find out what exactly it is.