HMS-Illustrious and CashMaker has been sanctioned for:
Quote:1.3 Every player must have one ID equipped on their ship. Player should follow the restrictions and allowances listed in their ID and their roleplay and conduct must match the actions of their characters. In cases where these restrictions and allowances conflict with the server rules, the ID overrides the rules. 2.1 System and local chats are to be kept in roleplay and in English at all times. Any OOC (Out of character) chat should be marked with " // " and only used when absolutely necessary. OOC communication in group or private chat between players will cease if one player requests it. Admins are free to communicate with any player at any time. 3.1 An attack is any hostile action that drains shields to less than 50%. Saying "Engaging" is not sufficient and aggressors are not allowed to destroy a ship before allowing sufficient time to respond. If a player is attacked he has the right to defend himself regardless of who is attacking. Trading nanobots, shieldbatteries or other ammo and equipment during a fight is also considered taking an active role in the engagement.
Consequences:
Along time ago, in a system not too far away...
Omega-9. Not in Bretonian space, nor one system over. So it's not within Bretonian authority. Yet, here is a Bretonian Battleship, issuing commands to a Bounty Hunter, and when the Bounty Hunter doesn't listen, the captain opens fire. Tsk tsk. Not nice, nor within the rules of the Armed Forces ID. Then comes a Junker, whom also gave no demand and no engagement notice to this Bounty Hunter, other than "Kill this Core". Not nice either, nor within the rules of the Junker ID OR the server rules of engagement. To top it all off, the Bretonian captain says a name not known in Sirius. Mystics though have theorized that such a name is used by a person in an alternate dimension playing a video game called Discovery.
Story time over guys. So this is not the first time either of you have crossed our desks. You both have been fined as well as lost your guns on your ships. Read your ID's re-read the server rules, and don't speak ooRP/about ooRP things in Local/System.
If you post in this sanction and are not directly involved or a leader of the accused person's faction be advised that you are consenting to be subjected to the reprisal of my choice which may involve in game repercussions up to a ban. Blaming members of your immediate family, neighbours, friends, pets, and assorted Orcs, Trolls and any other legendary creatures may result in the use of Admin Right #CTE 750AE
I am afraid this is a case of malicious reporting because when You know better than that, do not mention names was flying that core char he had an unquestionable desire to interrogate me over my trips to the omicrons.
When I failed to recognise his authority and continued to ignore him he then shot at me and a player base I was docked at in order to stop me from docking there.
My reactions were simply me defending myself from full blown aggression from someone who should be a friendly that had opened fire first!
I would like to see the full report to see what parts of the conversation, name again has left out
User was banned for: Black Widow
Time left: (Permanent)
(11-08-2014, 05:48 PM)black widow3 Wrote: I am afraid this is a case of malicious reporting because when You know better than that, do not mention names was flying that core char he had an unquestionable desire to interrogate me over my trips to the omicrons.
When I failed to recognise his authority and continued to ignore him he then shot at me and a player base I was docked at in order to stop me from docking there.
My reactions were simply me defending myself from full blown aggression from someone who should be a friendly that had opened fire first!
I would like to see the full report to see what parts of the conversation, name again has left out
black widow3,
We see nothing malicious in this report whatsoever. We were presented chat logs, but we base our actions on server chat logs, not the ones give to us by the accuser.
Reading the server chat logs, I got the sense that much of the aggression originated from you. We saw no evidence of the Core player threatening to attack you, in fact, it was quite the opposite. You threatened to pop him if he didn't leave the area, a demand that you had no authority to make and which violates your ID.
On top of that, you engaged in OORP talk, reflecting an OORP hate for this particular player. You mentioned that the Core was not even official and made reference to the player's forum name in a trollish way.
Cashmaker also violated his ID by engaging the Core player in your defense, something disallowed by the Junker ID.
All in all, I see no evidence to overturn this sanction. If you possess any evidence to back up your claims, we would be more than happy to review it.