• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 116 117 118 119 120 … 546 Next »
Directing trader activity towards lanes - attn all devs

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (13): 1 2 3 4 5 … 13 Next »
Directing trader activity towards lanes - attn all devs
Offline Pavel
04-15-2014, 01:44 AM,
#1
On leave
Posts: 2,018
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2012

I've been reading Xoria's trade development blog and I see big concern for making traders stick to trade lanes, as they are the very beginning of all activity.


But how to do that? Late night powertraders avoid few remaining pirates by using jumpholes or flying 30k under the plane.




Here's what I propose: let's nerf 5kers' cruise engines to Barge level - low speed, long charge time.

That way, big trading ships will be FORCED by the game mechanics to use lanes. No more under the plane diving to avoid pirates.





Q: Only 5kers? Or other ships would be nerfed too?
A: Initially I thought about everything bigger than battletransport. Dunno, maybe it would be good to nerf all transports above 4.3k, so they'd use lanes. They're called trains after all, and trains usually stick to railroads.

Q: I'm a Zoner, you can't nerf me there are no lanes in Omicrons where I fly, don't do it!
A: Zoners are special case, I'm sure some opinions how to deal with that specific problem will surface later during discussion.



Yeah sure, there are exemptions from normal trading like Zoners, but let's not derail topic by dramatizing special cases which'd be dealt with differently.
General idea is: if it's big transport trading inside House space and between Houses, it gets nerfed so it has to use lanes and gates. Traders use lanes, pirates ambush traders at the lanes, escorts and law enfrocers have something to do. You know how it goes.

Feedback please.
Reply  
Offline Zed26
04-15-2014, 01:52 AM, (This post was last modified: 04-15-2014, 01:54 AM by Zed26.)
#2
Member
Posts: 324
Threads: 12
Joined: Mar 2010

I'll take some time to brainstorm ideas and draw out some pros and cons, but initially, my concern is this: yes, silent, late-night powertraders contribute very little to the game, but they are a minority people love to hate and their impact is overstated, so a nerf affecting everyone is unwarranted. Also, consider that not all lane networks provide the best coverage, and some trade hotspots may be located some distance off the lanes. The lane and gate networks would need a serious revamp to keep the other aspects of trading the same.

If anything, having trade ships at a crawl gives the ships that do want to interact and RP less opportunity to move through the game and encounter more players.
Reply  
Offline Kazinsal
04-15-2014, 01:53 AM,
#3
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

As someone who supplies a POB in the arse end of nowhere, no pls

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Offline Omicron
04-15-2014, 01:57 AM,
#4
The Order
Posts: 4,745
Threads: 386
Joined: Nov 2009

This is propably one of the finest thoughts on disco I ever heard.

It will allow to put jump holes in much more advantageous positions for everyone else and force the biggest cashcows go along the trade lanes. Activity +, pls do.

[Image: E9d8RnV.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline Zelot
04-15-2014, 02:10 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 7,539
Threads: 379
Joined: Jun 2007

"Late night powertraders avoid few remaining pirates by using jumpholes or flying 30k under the plane"

I think we may have a conflict in terminology here.

Powertraders are generally accepted as people who find the most profitable route, and trade that as fast as possible to make as much cash as possible in as short an amount of time as possible.

Using Jumpholes, and more so flying 30K off the plane slows down the process of trading, and thus making money.

The two parts of this sentence seem to me to be mutually exclusive and contradictory.

So who are we talking about here that justifies such as big change?

[Image: 13121_s.gif]  
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
04-15-2014, 02:11 AM,
#6
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,343
Threads: 736
Joined: Jan 2013

I like this idea. +1

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Stoner_Steve
04-15-2014, 02:37 AM,
#7
Master of Arms
Posts: 2,549
Threads: 339
Joined: Jan 2014

I like the thought, and maybe a good compromise would be an ability to use the equipment slot (that usually goes unused) as the engine component for cruise.

e.g. I fly a Renzu liner, but I need a cruise engine, I can buy an item (call it what ever) that is mounted that lets me get to cruise speed even if I'm nerfed

[Image: O2vt8So.png]
SLRC Faction Document | SLRC Recruitment | SLRC Feedback | SLRC Message Dump
Reply  
Offline Xoria
04-15-2014, 02:37 AM,
#8
Black Hat Economist
Posts: 2,122
Threads: 244
Joined: Oct 2007
Staff roles:

Zelot raised the most relevant point in his post: the speed of the trade lanes themselves are already the greatest incentive to using the trade lanes.

Add to this the fact that the vast majority of the primary and most profitable trade routes travel along trade lane paths, and all the necessary incentives are in place already.

In 4.84 and prior, "powertraders" used the Diamond-Niobium route between Kyushu and New Berlin, making use of the jump hole shortcuts from NB-S13, S13-Chugoku, Chugoku-Hokkaido, Hokkaido-Kyushu, because those jump holes provided the fastest path between the buy and sell points. Now that those jump holes are no longer short cuts, such paths have fallen into disuse. Proper trade route planning and geographic revisions have essentially accomplished what no amount of piracy in Sigma 13 (myself among them) could: moving traders back to the trade lanes.

So, I really don't think it's necessary, and the uproar it would cause would be quite tremendous - final nail and all that. The Barge is a very, very special case and shouldn't be seen in any respect as a model for other circumstances.

But while I think this is a bad idea for a nerf to existing transports, including it as a feature of a larger class of transports, say 6kers, would be a fine idea. That way, nobody's existing toy is affected and people can make their decisions with full info about the implications. Note, however, that there are currently NO plans to introduce larger transports into the mod.

Check out my
Trade Development Blog
for all the latest news on Nerfs and Final Nails, or to request trade changes.

An Interactive Tour of OSC Routes  | POB Supplies
Reply  
Offline EisenSeele
04-15-2014, 02:41 AM,
#9
Herder of Cats
Posts: 2,691
Threads: 211
Joined: Jan 2010

Decrease all ship speeds across the board by a set percentage, except for lane speeds - which would have the same effect of making systems larger without having to change the locations of every object in every system.

AND/OR

Make all profitable trade routes dependent on multiple long stretches of trade lanes with no short cuts in between, /encouraging/ ships to use lanes that allow for piracy and/or law enforcement.

FEEDBACK
Reply  
Offline Xoria
04-15-2014, 02:45 AM,
#10
Black Hat Economist
Posts: 2,122
Threads: 244
Joined: Oct 2007
Staff roles:

(04-15-2014, 02:41 AM)EisenSeele Wrote: Make all profitable trade routes dependent on multiple long stretches of trade lanes with no short cuts in between, /encouraging/ ships to use lanes that allow for piracy and/or law enforcement.
Basically already accomplished, where possible. Obviously this is not entirely true for bases that are outside the trade lane network entirely, like Atka, Falkland, Java, PL Kurile. A penalty to cruise speed would also mean an effective penalty to trade with such bases. Do the Taus, Sigmas, Omegas, and Omicrons really need fewer traders? Doubtful.

Check out my
Trade Development Blog
for all the latest news on Nerfs and Final Nails, or to request trade changes.

An Interactive Tour of OSC Routes  | POB Supplies
Reply  
Pages (13): 1 2 3 4 5 … 13 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode