• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 111 112 113 114 115 … 546 Next »
Deployable static defences

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Deployable static defences
Offline Pavel
06-20-2014, 05:56 AM,
#1
On leave
Posts: 2,018
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2012

Could we have deployable weapon platforms like the ones spawned during missions? Or minefields? Just like mission platforms, deployable platforms and mines shouldn't be too hard to destroy or deal too much damage; I think it would bring another after POBs element of dynamism to the mod.

I imagine that in a similar way base constructor deploys new bases - with special command, using resources in the process. Think of a new activity chain and fun of a cat-and-mouse game between opposing factions, setting up guarded by not really dangerous platforms or mines (unless in high numbers) areas and their enemies patrolling space in search of hostile buildup to destroy it.



I don't know how easy/hard would that be to implement, but since we already have deployable structures in the form of POBs, I thought it's worth asking.
Reply  
Offline Singularity
06-20-2014, 06:36 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 768
Threads: 11
Joined: May 2013

Its an innovative idea and will certainly add to the dynamic nature of the POB element.

But just one doubt in my mind - Wouldn't that cause a problem for the factions which don't have active player group ???

Although I understand that it will be quite easy to destroy, but if it is, then why would someone take the pain to build it ???

But yes, the positive side, can be a guard system with many Mines and platforms forbidding any enemy infiltration (as more the number would make, destroying them relatively difficult as you have mentioned)

||| Ollie's way ||| Ship Dealer ||| Code & Equipment shop |||

[Image: 33267_s.gif]

Low: ||| IMG ||| GMG ||| Platinum ||| Punisher ||| Kruger ||| ALG ||| RS ||| Phoenix ||| 101st ||| BD ||| ODF ||| RHA ||| _Decent: ||| Ronin ||| DHC ||| NET ||| BAF|A |||
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
06-20-2014, 06:52 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

I'd rather see actual ships doing defending that troll platforms in Penny shooting new players out of the blue, or anywhere for that matter.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Offline sindroms
06-20-2014, 06:56 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 9,434
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

Oh! Oh! Oh!

I am so not falling for that again.
Last time we were promised this in 85, but it turned out to be a starflyer with two battleship guns strapped to it by the devs.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
06-20-2014, 07:37 AM,
#5
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

I believe such suggestion (not necessarily in this form) was already part of discussions regarding PoB (re)balance. Back then I remember suggestions popping up such as dividing PoBs to different specialized versions, a trade/storage/manufcture hub which would only differ from the current version at losing it's offensive capabilities (read. weapon platforms), and an easy-build easy-destroy low-cost version with solely offensive capabilities. The only problem I could see regarding anything related to PoBs is that I recall Kaz being the dev behind the whole, but I don't think recalling him to continue his work is an option now. I could be wrong though.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Online Lythrilux
06-20-2014, 08:30 AM,
#6
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,343
Threads: 736
Joined: Jan 2013

(06-20-2014, 06:52 AM)Snak3 Wrote: I'd rather see actual ships doing defending that troll platforms in Penny shooting new players out of the blue, or anywhere for that matter.
Agreed.

(06-20-2014, 06:56 AM)sindroms Wrote: Oh! Oh! Oh!

I am so not falling for that again.
Last time we were promised this in 85, but it turned out to be a starflyer with two battleship guns strapped to it by the devs.
Seriously?

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Connor
06-20-2014, 08:39 AM,
#7
Nomadmin
Posts: 3,606
Threads: 327
Joined: Aug 2012

It'd be just like placing a player base. Get some materials to build it, then do something like /build wplatform

[Image: Snoopyman.gif]
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
06-20-2014, 08:39 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

Or pull a Hoover.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Offline Moberg
06-20-2014, 08:48 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 836
Threads: 45
Joined: Jul 2012

This was already discussed in dev chat months ago(at that time with the option of implementing it as a perk for carriers) but it kind of vanished at some point without a real decision being made.

I'd really like to see this happening. Maybe you need a 'construction module' or something on your ship (Put it in CM slot, and then a fixed amount of resources to build it via command). They should take a fixed damage amount of damage per minute so they don't last forever (like 20 minutes if nobody bothered to attack?).
About shipclasses using it - I'd be up for transports below 4300 cargo to give those more purpose in terms of combat like a support ship
Reply  
Offline Haste
06-20-2014, 01:10 PM,
#10
Lead Developer
Posts: 3,552
Threads: 107
Joined: May 2012
Staff roles:
Balance Dev

(06-20-2014, 06:52 AM)Snak3 Wrote: I'd rather see actual ships doing defending

[Image: cdSeFev.png]
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode