• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 152 153 154 155 156 … 546 Next »
Old ship designs

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Old ship designs
Offline Alan Martins
05-29-2013, 12:23 PM,
#1
Member
Posts: 161
Threads: 23
Joined: Apr 2013

hey just curious but how come some old designs,specially 2009 coalition ones[aside from the GB]were replaced?i mean,they look totally cool compared to current ones.Anyway,i hope i'm not dragging up some really old argument or anything,i'm just curious.

FWC Links:
Feedback: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99378
Discussion: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99356
Wiki: http://discoverygc.com/wiki/Freelance_Worker_Coalition
Recruitment: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99379
Reply  
Offline Anaximander
05-29-2013, 12:42 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-29-2013, 12:45 PM by Anaximander.)
#2
Member
Posts: 1,261
Threads: 62
Joined: Jun 2012

I agree, I really liked them too, but design-wise they were quite different from other disco ships, i.e. shorter and with a large front / side profile. Maybe balance led to their demise, I don't know.

If the models aren't imports / Disco is free to use them, I'd really love to see them back. Always wanted to fly one, but back then Coalition was closed.
Reply  
Offline Alan Martins
05-29-2013, 12:49 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 161
Threads: 23
Joined: Apr 2013

aye,and not just coalition models,but there were some others that looked awesome as well,like the old paladin and such.

FWC Links:
Feedback: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99378
Discussion: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99356
Wiki: http://discoverygc.com/wiki/Freelance_Worker_Coalition
Recruitment: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99379
Reply  
Offline Alan Martins
05-29-2013, 12:53 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-29-2013, 12:55 PM by Alan Martins.)
#4
Member
Posts: 161
Threads: 23
Joined: Apr 2013

also these:
http://discoverygc.com/wiki/File:Praefect.jpg
http://discoverygc.com/wiki/File:Kusaritransport.jpg
http://discoverygc.com/wiki/File:Dragonbomber.jpg
http://discoverygc.com/wiki/File:Dragoncruiser.jpg
just touch up the graphics a little and poof!instant awesomeness!

FWC Links:
Feedback: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99378
Discussion: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99356
Wiki: http://discoverygc.com/wiki/Freelance_Worker_Coalition
Recruitment: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99379
Reply  
Offline JayDee Kasane
05-29-2013, 02:18 PM,
#5
Member
Posts: 2,023
Threads: 51
Joined: Apr 2011

I agree on Coalition part for 100%. I dont, and never liked current snub line of Coalition. They is not with Coalition Lore of making ships, they ugly and poor made, they just copy of Daggers with Odin part. 4.85 ones was replaced because someone instantly Q_Q that they had broken hit-box. So instead of fixing their hitbox, Devs fully replaced whole line to scrap. I dissappointed in such decisions and my faith to Dev team dropped because of that. I really hope that in 4.87 we shall have fixed stuff, or that will be awful. But 4.85 snubs seems not going to return. Which is damn stupid and sad.

[Image: 6FadQ6bTk_g.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Alan Martins
05-29-2013, 02:35 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 161
Threads: 23
Joined: Apr 2013

i totally agree that the 4.86 commie ships look horrible and we should all lobby to have them returned,and every player should swear never to come play again and let it die if they don't.

FWC Links:
Feedback: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99378
Discussion: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99356
Wiki: http://discoverygc.com/wiki/Freelance_Worker_Coalition
Recruitment: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99379
Reply  
Offline JayDee Kasane
05-29-2013, 02:44 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 2,023
Threads: 51
Joined: Apr 2011

(05-29-2013, 02:35 PM)Alan Martins Wrote: ... every player should swear never to come play again and let it die if they don't.

That is not what I would like to see...

Better is to get people on your side and request Devs to return 4.85 Coalition snubs and fix their hitbox. But they now busy with 4.87 and they wont do any changes to it untill beta. So we need to wait. Who knows, maybe 4.87 coalition stuff will be so awasome so we wont even need 4.85 snubs.

But I highly doubt that...

[Image: 6FadQ6bTk_g.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Alan Martins
05-29-2013, 02:51 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 161
Threads: 23
Joined: Apr 2013

(05-29-2013, 02:44 PM)JayDee Wrote:
(05-29-2013, 02:35 PM)Alan Martins Wrote: ... every player should swear never to come play again and let it die if they don't.

That is not what I would like to see...

Better is to get people on your side and request Devs to return 4.85 Coalition snubs and fix their hitbox. But they now busy with 4.87 and they wont do any changes to it untill beta. So we need to wait. Who knows, maybe 4.87 coalition stuff will be so awasome so we wont even need 4.85 snubs.

But I highly doubt that...
one can hope,though you're right,letting disco die over a few ships would be stupid,however,something must be done to correct this problem.anyway,i for one shall wait until .87 and see.

FWC Links:
Feedback: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99378
Discussion: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99356
Wiki: http://discoverygc.com/wiki/Freelance_Worker_Coalition
Recruitment: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99379
Reply  
Offline JIVA
05-29-2013, 02:52 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 380
Threads: 19
Joined: Jan 2008

http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...=coalition

Prior to 4.86 it seems that that SCRA wanted to revise their ships. Returning to the old models would also revive the old problems. The above post was made 2009 before the release of 4.86. After that, the new models were made.

[Image: JIVA_Sig_zps4e7f97f1.png]
the [JIVA] group
Reply  
Offline Alan Martins
05-29-2013, 02:56 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 161
Threads: 23
Joined: Apr 2013

yet they still look like outcast-RH hybrids,and the tech should be far enough along that new gear in old hulls is totally plausible.


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
05-29-2013, 02:56 PM   

FWC Links:
Feedback: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99378
Discussion: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99356
Wiki: http://discoverygc.com/wiki/Freelance_Worker_Coalition
Recruitment: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=99379
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode