Galileo Mining Rights

[Catto]

Catto, you can forget about anyone other than DSE mining that field if LSF gets its way, this entire document is a piece of paper waiting for anyone sufficiently powerful to make it worth the paper it’s printed on.

The LSF isn't a neutral party. A more likely candidate would be the BHG, and only arguably. xD

[Barrier]

Catto, you're right, an ostensibly neutral enforcer would go a long way towards solving the situation. But that would defeat the purpose of the exercise If there was such a party, then the corps wouldn't be able to have any fun.

Bounty hunters would be my choice as well. I think they still have a lot of opportunity to involve themselves as is.

[Catto]

I'd recommend you change the angle you see this from. Whilst a common enforcer will in fact stop the corporations from attacking each other directly, it will ensure there's one cop, and many robbers to play. Any unlawful hitting corporate competitors will have to run a gauntlet against the local enforcer and corporate defenders in a way that can be planned against, and I think that's both more interesting and more enticing for parties likely to participate.

[Bristol Constructions]

The general problem is that this agreement isn't actually intended on lessening the security concerns or status as it now stands. This is intended to continue the status of the contested area until such time as one group or another can adequately, completely assert itself in Galileo.

---