• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Bug Reports Fixed or invalid
« Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 87 Next »
[Server Config]Freighter mining advantage lost

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

[Server Config]Freighter mining advantage lost
Offline rwx
04-04-2025, 02:29 PM,
#1
No one is above the law
Posts: 1,032
Threads: 155
Joined: May 2010

Type: Server Config
Bug: The mining boni per ship class in minecontrol.cfg are all equal.

Code:
[ShipTypeBonus]
ship_class_bonus = 0, 1.2, 1.6, 1.0
ship_class_bonus = 1, 1.2, 1.6, 1.0
ship_class_bonus = 2, 1.2, 1.4, 1.0
ship_class_bonus = 3, 1.2, 1.6, 1.0
ship_class_bonus = 4, 1.2, 1.6, 1.0
ship_class_bonus = 5, 1.2, 1.6, 1.0
ship_class_bonus = 14, 1.2, 1.5, 2.0

Additional Information:
All listed ship classes have a mining ship bonus of 1.2.
This was previously a prerogative for snub miners (to fill the haulers faster)
Please revert the non-snub boni back to 1.0, assuming this was not intended.
Offline Petitioner
06-04-2025, 07:54 AM,
#2
a e s t h e t i c
Posts: 3,349
Threads: 292
Joined: Dec 2009
Staff roles:
Server Administrator

Looking into this

[Image: gamer5000.gif]

Recruitment | Task Force Prometheus | ICN FIRESTORM
 
Offline Haste
06-04-2025, 12:29 PM,
#3
Lead Developer
Posts: 3,546
Threads: 107
Joined: May 2012
Staff roles:
Balance Dev

I set this config up this way intentionally, based on the following logic/assumptions:
  • Whether a ship can mine or not is not currently defined by whether or not it has bonuses defined. Ships that can mount mining arrays are ships that can mine. This is generally a (small) subset of all ships.
  • We introduced mining containers, which act as a great equalizer for "old mining", and makes "small" differences in cargo space (like between fighters and freighters) mostly irrelevant.
  • Smaller, more mobile ships with higher turn rates mine faster by definition. This makes the smallest miners the most effective regardless of bonuses.

I may be wrong, and we may currently be facing a Dunlin "old mining" meta. If so, please do let me know. If not, then everything seems to be working as intended, and we don't need random, opaque bonuses further complicating things.

[Image: cdSeFev.png]
Offline IahimD
06-04-2025, 12:45 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 194
Threads: 36
Joined: Dec 2012

(06-04-2025, 12:29 PM)Haste Wrote: [...]
I may be wrong, and we may currently be facing a Dunlin "old mining" meta. If so, please do let me know. If not, then everything seems to be working as intended, and we don't need random, opaque bonuses further complicating things.

The Dunlin has no mining bonus, no? (As in, it has the generic 1.0 and not the 1.2 'buff'). And I think it is the same for the Kamome, Kaiser, Rock Badger.
For reference, according to darkstats, Dunlin is class 6, which is clearly missing from the list in the first post. Classes 0 to 4 are snubs, class 5 has... no ship (???) and class 14 contains only Hege and Archon.


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode